Two Opposites are Not Simultaneously True – The Opposite of Holy is Unholy

14 Mar

munaafiqiin pretending to be Muslim scholars address the pope as:

“his holiness the pope”

“h.h. pope”

I don’t think any person with a sound mind (i.e., Muslim) can argue the fact that Islam is the opposite of kufr.

christianity is kufr.

So Islam and christianity are opposites.

The Quran destroys the ugly belief of trinity and the trinitarians themselves and says:

لَّقَدْ كَفَرَ الَّذِينَ قَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ ثَالِثُ ثَلَاثَةٍ ۘ وَمَا مِنْ إِلَٰهٍ إِلَّا إِلَٰهٌ وَاحِدٌ ۚ وَإِن لَّمْ يَنتَهُوا عَمَّا يَقُولُونَ لَيَمَسَّنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْهُمْ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ

Translation of meaning: Indeed, they do commit kufr [becoming kafir], those who say, “Allah is one of three in a trinity” and there is no God except one God, and if they do not desist from their saying, indeed a painful punishment shall befall the [ones who die] kafirs among them. [Holy Quran 5:73]

Islam is the opposite of kufr, and since trinity is kufr (one among other forms of it) as expressly stated in the Quran, then what does that make a trinity-thumping christian as opposed to a Tawhiid-carrying haniif Muslim?

It is obvious that If a trinity-thumping kafir, the head of trinitarians more so, is called as “his holiness” by these people, then these munaafiqiin consider Tawhiid-carrying Muslims to be unholy.

If a trinity-thumping kafir, a leader of the trinitarians more so, is called a “holy” person, then what exactly are these people calling the filthy belief of trinity itself? 

If a trinity-thumping kafir is addressed as “his beatitude”, then what exactly do these people believe in regards to the trinity itself? 

If they consider the putrid belief of trinity as “holy”, then it is clear what these people believe in regards to Allah’s Tawhiid. 

Then it is as clear as the mid-day sun that these people are not Muslims but rather their label of Islam is a farce, their beards are no different than the beards of sikhs and jews, their turbans and cloaks are the mere skins of lambs that these swines have clad in order to fool the masses, their so-called practice of the Sunnah is a sham, their sweet-sounding lectures are nothing but a deception similar to the deception of the dajjal!

The Quran calls the trinity-thumpers as grave liars and ignorant morons born to other ignorant morons. Any Muslim who has even read Surah Kahf once in his life, will know this:

وَيُنذِرَ الَّذِينَ قَالُوا اتَّخَذَ اللَّهُ وَلَدًا

مَّا لَهُم بِهِ مِنْ عِلْمٍ وَلَا لِآبَائِهِمْ ۚ كَبُرَتْ كَلِمَةً تَخْرُجُ مِنْ أَفْوَاهِهِمْ ۚ إِن يَقُولُونَ إِلَّا كَذِبًا

Translation of meaning: And to warn those who say that Allah has taken a son. They have nothing from knowledge, neither do their fathers; grave[ly despicable] is the word that leaves their mouths; they speak but a lie. [Holy Quran 18:4-5]

No wonder, according to many strong narrations, the Prophet ﷺ has said that memorizing the first 10 verses of Surah Kahf will protect Muslims from the deception of the dajjal, bi-idhnillah (the last 10 verses are mentioned in yet other narrations); and no wonder Muslims have been goaded by our master Rasulullah ﷺ to read it every Friday. 

لاحول ولاقوة الا بالله العلي العظيم

There is no power and no might; except with Allah. 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 responses to “Two Opposites are Not Simultaneously True – The Opposite of Holy is Unholy

  1. M.Mahmud

    February 3, 2016 at 10:45 am

    “Oh but agnostics and Jews don’t do shirk and shirk is the only unforgivable sin therefore Jews can be saved”

    Sarcasm 100%

    I’ve literally heard this ridiculous argument. Some people keep spreading the belief that shirk is the only sin that will never be forgiven (so even a man that believes la ilaha ilallah but insults Rasulullah sallahualayhiwasalam can some day enter Jannah!!!)

    • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

      March 17, 2016 at 5:27 pm

      shirk = kufr

      shirk and kufr are synonyms as far as scholastic theology is concerned.

      If a person does kufr, he is really denying Allah and attributing the creation of the universe to other than Allah.

      If he is an atheist, he is really saying that the universe created itself; in other words, he is saying that the universe is its own god.

      If he is a hindu or any other idolater, he believes in the universe being created by other than Allah.

      If he is a christian or jew, then by denying the prophethood of RasulAllah ﷺ, he is really saying that the god who sent Moses and Jesus, ‘alaihimus salam, is not the one who sent our Master Muhammad ﷺ, which is essentially, a fictitious, non-existent non-entity.

      This is why scholars have said that any and every denial of the prophethood of our Master RasulAllah ﷺ is shirk – because the ONE & ONLY GOD OF THE UNIVERSE IS THE ONE WHO CREATED THIS UNIVERSE, AND SENT ADAM, AND MOSES, AND JESUS – AND MUHAMMAD ﷺ (along with all the other prophets too, peace be on them all)


      Anything else is BOTH shirk and kufr.

      See this post for the words of scholars –


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: