The Sunni Manifesto & the enemy within

As-Salamu ‘Alaikum

Please CLICK HERE to download/read the pdf. Read below online.


1 – The Ahlus-Sunnah Manifesto

WE Muslims, the people of the Ahlus Sunnah, the people of Ash’ari and Maturidi ‘aqaid and the 4 madhhabs of the Ahlus Sunnah, the Hanafis, the Shafi’iys, the Hanbaliys, & the Malikis – DO hereby solemnly declare:-

1. That there is NO God EXCEPT ALLAH, SUBHANAHU WA TA’ALA – our Sustainer and Creator; and

2. That He does NOT resemble His creation. He is free from bondages of time and space that He created, exalted is He from being in a location, acting in time, or going through changes; and

3. That He is NOT a physical body composed of parts or limbs or divisions or an angelic body of light. He is free of the attributes of male, female, neuter found in His creation and far exalted is He from having a son or daughter or partner; and

4. That He is also NOT just an abstract entity like happiness or anger or pain. Our minds are incapacitated to comprehend His Magnificence. ANYONE who attributes Him with the attributes of creation like being limited by time & space, or being a body and so on – is a kafir, and we distance ourselves from him;  and

5. That it is ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE for Him to lie. His Speech is an eternal attribute of His and NOT CONTINGENT to anything. Such is our belief and the belief of the sahaba and our pious elders of the Ahlus Sunnah. Whoever says that “it is contingently impossible for Allah to lie” or say that “it is not intrinsically impossible for Allah to lie” – is a perverted apostate blaspheming against our Creator and we dissociate ourselves from ANY such person. Our Creator & Sustainer is free of ALL defects and ALL His attributes are those of magnificence and perfection; and

6. That our Master Rasulullah, Prophet Muhammad ﷺ is the last and final messenger of Allah. Anyone who has claimed prophethood after him, currently claims prophethood, or will claim prophethood in the future – is a cursed liar, an impostor and a kafir; and

7. That ANY person who follows any such impostor claiming prophethood after our Master Rasulullah ﷺ, like the accursed qadianis OR as much as doubts the finality of his messengerhood – is an apostate, outside of Islam, deserving of everlasting damnation lest he embraces Islam before witnessing the angel of death. We do NOT doubt the apostasy of such a person and believe that those who doubt the apostasy of such people are themselves apostates; and

8. That our Master Rasulullah ﷺ is the best and most perfect creation of Allah and the most honored of His messengers and prophets. Those who mock our Master Rasulullah ﷺ by saying that his knowledge is like that of satan, or madmen or children or animals, OR saying that thinking of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ during prayers is worse than thinking about an animal, OR mocks him or any other prophet of Allah in any way, shape or form, OR are approving of any such mockery – are ALL perverted apostates who blaspheme against our Creator by mocking His messenger – and we dissociate ourselves from ALL such people; and

9. That Allah has informed His beloved prophet of matters of the unseen so much so that no other creation has been given any such knowledge. A prophet by definition is someone who informs us of the matters of the unseen, such as angels, heaven, hell, Day of Judgment etc. Those who say that our Master Rasulullah ﷺ did not possess any such or special knowledge are perverted transgressors who do not even understand the basic definition of prophethood. Likewise, those who deny the knowledge of hadith and the commands of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ, are ignorant, perverted transgressors. We dissociate ourselves from ALL such people; and 

10. That our masters Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, radzi Allahu ‘anhumaa, are the greatest of men after the prophets of Allah, followed by our masters ‘Uthman and ‘Ali, radzi Allahu ‘anhumaa. Those who impose the superiority of our master ‘Ali over our master Abu Bakr and ‘Umar are misguided and people of bid’ah, going against the Sunnah of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ, consensus of the sahaba and even the manifest instructions of our master ‘Ali to NOT hold him as superior to our masters Abu Bakr and ‘Umar. We dissociate ourselves from all such people of bid’ah; and

11. That whoever expresses hatred and animosity against the rightly guided khulafaa, or the jama’ah of the sahaba or the blessed Ummahaatul Mumineen, ridzwan Allahi ‘alaihim ajma’een, and/or curses them or attributes to them apostasy or hypocrisy  – such a person is a kafir according to our fuqahaa by ijma’. The way of the people of the truth is to express love and adoration towards ALL those who are beloved to our Master Rasulullah ﷺ, the sahaba, as well as the ahlul bayt; and

12. That the disputes between our masters ‘Ali and Mu’awiya, and the different sahaba, radzi Allahu ‘anhum, on their respective sides – were based on differences of ijtihad. It is a great haram to speak ill of ANY of them any more than stating that their disputes were based on differences of ijtihad, regardless of which side of the dispute they were on. It is most certainly an enormity to speak ill of ANY companion of our master Rasulullah ﷺ and such a person is a woeful rafidzi; and

13. That whoever says that the Quran is incomplete, or incorrect, or ascribes superior status to any non-prophet over any prophet – is an apostate outside of Islam. We dissociate ourselves from ALL such people; and

14. That our father Adam, ‘ala nabiyyina wa ‘alaihis salam, is the first of humans and the first prophet of Allah, created DIRECTLY in his human form. Anyone who says that he ‘evolved’ or ‘descended’ from apes or ANY other plant, animal, human, any inanimate object, etc. – blasphemes against the Quran’s direct and explicit teachings, well established ahadith, and the ijma’ of the ummah – in addition to the blasphemy of dishonoring a prophet. We dissociate from all such people; and

15. That ALL PEOPLE who are outside of Islam, whether ahl al-kitab like christians & jews, or others like hindus, atheists, budhhists, etc. are ALL KUFFAAR/MUSHRIKEEN (kafir and mushrik are synonyms as far as beliefs are concerned).

The ‘ahl al-kitab’ (people of the book) status is conferred in the Shari’ah ONLY to christians and jews for the reasons of acknowledging the esteemed prophets and books (in their original, un-tampered form) sent them by Allah and for the purposes of some points of fiqh relating to marriage and slaughter. It DOES NOT MEAN that they are not kuffaar. The Quran and hadith and the ijma’ of the ummah categorically call them kuffaar for various reasons like worshiping the prophet ‘Eisa and/or his mother, ‘ala nabiyyina wa ‘alaihimus salam, or for calling themselves ‘children of god’ or for letting their priests and rabbis make the haram halal and vice versa, or for attributing incapability to Allah.

Most importantly it is a CONDITION OF ISLAM to accept the CURRENT prophet of Allah (along with all the previous ones), and FROM our Master Rasulullah’s ﷺdeclaration of prophethood, UNTIL forever, our Master Rasulullah ﷺis the current and the last and final prophet of Allah. Whoever does not accept our Master Rasulullah ﷺas the last and final prophet of Allah, he is a kafir.

We do NOT doubt ANYONE who is outside of Islam – that is ANY ONE who does not accept our Master Rasulullah ﷺ as Allah’s last & final messenger – as being kafir. ANYONE who does not call the people outside of Islam as kuffaar/mushrikeen, OR doubts their kufr, OR tries to prove their religions and/or ideologies as praiseworthy, OR tries to draw parallels between their ways trying to equate them to Islam – as stated by the ijma’ of our elders like the sahaba and the mujtahid imams of the ummah – is an APOSTATE and a further debased kafir than those whose kufr he is doubting and/or praising. We dissociate ourselves from ALL such people; and

16. That Allah’s promise of everlasting paradise is for MUSLIMS ONLY, who are the people who accept Him as their God AND His Messenger Muhammad ﷺ as His last and final messenger; and

17. That Allah’s promise of everlasting damnation in the hellfire is for ALL KUFFAAR. Those who say that the kuffaar too shall enter paradise or that the kuffaar shall not suffer everlastingly in hellfire – oppose the Quran’s explicit commandments & promises and numerous sahih ahadith. Such people are ALSO apostates by ijma’ of our mujtahid elders of the Ahlus Sunnah and we dissociate ourselves from them; and

18. That our Master Rasulullah ﷺ’s promise of his blessed shafa’ah (intercession) on the Day of Judgment is ONLY for Muslims, AND that NO KAFIR shall attain his shafa’ah. Whoever believes that any kafir shall attain our Master Rasulullah ﷺ’s shafa’ah is negating explicit verses from the Quran and numerous sahih ahadith and making a mockery of Allah’s Promise. Such a person is an apostate from Islam and we dissociate ourselves from him; and

19. That the institutions of marriage between a man and a woman, and family, are honored in Islam – and that homosexuality is HARAM (forbidden) in Islam. Sex is ONLY allowed between a man and a woman who are married to each other, and Muslims can only marry Muslims, Muslim men being permitted to marry dhimmi christian and jewish women in an Islamic state. ANYONE who claims that homosexuality is permissible in Islam or says that marriages between the same genders are permissible – is an APOSTATE from Islam making a mockery of Allah’s deen. Likewise, ANYONE who states that Muslim females are allowed to marry kafir men, or that Muslim men are allowed to marry any women other than Muslim, christian or jewish women – is an APOSTATE from Islam. Likewise, ALL such people who make a mockery of the Shari’ah and its signs like the niqab or the beard or Muslim clothing, by calling its explicitly stated commandments and/or laws and/or punishments as ‘old fashioned’ or ‘brutal’ or ‘barbaric’ or ‘from medieval times’ and so on – are ALL APOSTATES from Islam. We dissociate ourselves from ALL such people; and

20. That the ways of the Ahlus Sunnah are RESTRICTED ONLY to those of the Ash’aris & Maturidis in ‘aqaid. ONLY the people of these ‘aqaid are the TRUE followers of the four madhhabs Hanafi, Shafi’iy, Hanbali & Maliki – and since there has been no mujtahid mutlaq for centuries, and if someone is not a mujtahid mutlaq, taqleed (following these madhhabs in jurisprudence) is compulsory on him. People who do not adhere to the ‘aqaid of the Ash’aris and Maturidis and one of these four madhhabs, are called ghayr muqallideen and they are either severe sinners on bid’ah or apostates; and

21. That it is PERMISSIBLE to pray to Allah by the TAWASSUL of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ, or any pious Muslim like his noble companions, our mujtahid mutlaq imams, and the awliyaa. Those who deny this have a malice in their hearts against the love of Allah’s honored slaves, and we dissociate ourselves from ALL such people; and

22. That it is also PERMISSIBLE to call unto these esteemed slaves of Allah, the prophets & awliyaa, to seek their prayers and blessings, saying such words as “As-Salamu ‘alaika ayyuhan nabiyyu” or “Ya Rasulullah ﷺ” or “Ya Abu Bakr” or “Ya ‘Umar” or “Ya ‘Uthman” or “Ya ‘Ali” or “Ya ‘Abdul Qadir Jeylani” and so on. They hear in their graves by Allah’s creating and His granted leave. Those who oppose to this are mainly anthropomorphist who believe that what they worship is located in a far away location, and so they consider it ‘shirk’ when someone else is called in a far away location or moved on from this physical world; and

23. That the virtuous benefits offered to Muslims at the hands of the prophets and these pious slaves, the awliyaa, by Allah’s creating & granting, were manifest during their own physical lives AND they also continue after their deaths and this shall be the case until the Day of Judgment. Praising them, honoring them, and seeking their blessings is a means of expressing thankfulness towards Allah Himself for blessing us with such lighthouses of guidance; and

24. That the gatherings of marking the blessed MAWLID of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ, PERMISSIBLE, and an extremely noble and virtuous act, in these times of fitnah, when the Ahlus Sunnah are attacked from all sides by his enemies; and

25. That Allah and His Messenger have forbidden us from befriending the kuffaar and interfaith dialogue can ONLY AND ONLY be used on two matters:

To call the kuffaar to Islam, refuting and destroying their kufr by sound rational logic, the verses of the Quran, and the ahadith of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ, as the Quran says – for example, to tell the christians to detest the trinity, accept our Master ‘Eisa, ‘ala nabiyyina wa ‘alaihis salam, as Allah’s slave and prophet AND to accept our Master Rasulullah ﷺ as the final prophet whose law is to be followed till the day of judgment, OR our Master Ibrahim’s, ‘ala nabiyyina wa ‘alaihis salam, using of sound rational arguments to destroy polytheism.

– To discuss any matter of shared worldly importance relating to our co-existence on this planet, like for example, a crime-free society, or traffic safety; and

26. That IT IS KUFR TO honor the kuffaar by addressing their religious heads as “your holiness”, “his beatitude” and so on, OR to refer to them as “father” or “mother” as they do to their priests, nuns and so on, OR to ask them to pray for us, OR to pray together with them, OR to join them in their religious gatherings, OR to wish them for their festivals like christmas, easter, hanukkah, diwali, etc., OR to celebrate their festivals, OR to visit their religious monuments for the purpose of honoring them or their religion, OR to say that their religions are respectable/acceptable (kufr is neither acceptable nor respectable in front of Islam), OR  praying for their dead, OR ANY OTHER ACT OR SAYING that honors them or their religion or non-religion, IMPLICITLY OR EXPLICITLY. ALL of kufr is ONE nation in front of Islam – IS the consensus of our elders like the sahaba and the mujtahid imams. We dissociate ourselves from ALL such apostates who honor kufr and the kuffaar in the name of ‘interfaith dialogue’; and

27. That NONE OF Shari’ah, Tariiqah or Haqiiqah contradict each other. Those who believe in the ‘aqiidah of hulool (the filthy concept that man and God unite), OR those who believe that “all religions lead to Allah”, OR those who believe that “different religions are just different ways to worship the same god” – are APOSTATES from Islam and NOT from us as they are exactly the same as those people who honor kufr and the kuffaar. We dissociate ourselves from ALL such people, even if they call themselves “Sufi” or “Naqshbandi” or “Qadiri” or “Shadhili” or anything. They are only impostors in the name of “Sufism”.

ONLY & ONLY those who adhere to this manifesto IN ITS ENTIRETY, are from the people of the trutth. 

ANYONE who does not adhere to this manifesto IN ITS ENTIRETY, is NOT from the Ahlus Sunnah – REGARDLESS if he calls himself as Ash’ari or Maturidi or Hanafi or Shafi’iy or Hanbali or Maliki or Sufi or Qadiri or Naqshbandi or Shadhili or any other name associated to any of the accepted schools of thoughts and/or methodologies associated to the people of the Ahlus Sunnah, who are the people of truth – and he is either a misguided miscreant on bid’ah OR an apostate – and we dissociate ourselves from him.

And Allah alone grants success.


2 – The Enemies Of The Ahlus Sunnah

Firstly, please follow these 3 simple steps to acquaint yourself with who the enemies of Islam & the Ahlus Sunnah are, who are eating Islam from within like termites:

  1. Familiarize yourself with the diagram below regarding the enemies of Islam and the Ahlus Sunnah.
  2. Read the simple explanations to the diagram, and understand completely and concisely, exactly where and how Islam & the Ahlus Sunnah are being attacked from various different directions by various different scavengers, both the kuffaar having imperial designs on Islam, as well as their colonial slaves pretending to be Muslims.
  3. Read The Ahlus Sunnah Manifesto again and use it as the perfect litmus test to find out who are the people who claim to be ‘scholars’ of Islam, but yet they are swine in the skin of lamb. Anyone who doesn’t agree to EVERY SINGLE POINT on this Ahlus Sunnah Manifesto, is simply NOT a scholar of Islam but rather a colonial slave. The points listed therein are a collation of crucial faith-related matters confronting the faiths of innocent Muslims in our times, specially on the internet, and the swine wearing the skin of lamb are working very diligently to corrupt innocent Muslims’ faiths on these matters. The positions stated in the manifesto are agreed upon by consensus (ijma’) over the ENTIRE history of Islam as being those taught by the Quran, Sunnah, sahaba, and all our mujtahid scholars. So please take good note and if ANYONE doesn’t agree on ALL THOSE points, please run far away from him.

At the end, some basic questions that you might have in mind shall be answered.

Enemies of the Ahlus Sunnah

A bubble diagram showing the major enemies of the Ahlus Sunnah.

The MAJOR enemies within:-

2-1 – The wahabis –

They are an offshoot of the khawarij, the very first calamity to strike Islam from within. The hallmarks of this group of bid’ah are to call PROPER Muslims as people of bid’ah and/or kafir. They leave the kuffaar and war against Muslims. In the modern times, they are KNOWN & RECOGNIZED by their affinity to the heretics ibn taymiyyah and ibn ‘abdul wahhaab. ibn taymiyyah is well known for attributing Allah with limits, bodily attributes, being composed of parts, being limited by directions and space and so on. His fitnah was sleeping for a long time, until it was revived by another heretic, ibn ‘abdul wahhaab and his partners in heresy from the najd, led by ibn sa’ud. In keeping with the tradition of his elders, he went to war against Muslims, dishonored their lives, properties and women, all the while aiding the kuffaar against Muslims. He is the father of all modern day terrorists who murder both innocent Muslims, as well as those kuffaar who are not supposed to be harmed.

To dupe innocent Sunnis, they too like to call themselves as ‘Ahlus Sunnah’ when in fact they are triple divorced from the Ahlus Sunnah. At times, they may claim to take rulings from the four madhhabs of fiqh in matters of jurisprudence, but in matters greater than jurisprudence, ‘aqidah and usul, they are purely the enemies of the Ahlus Sunnah.

They have a special dislike for ANY matter that accords love, admiration, honor and respect to our Master Rasulullah ﷺ, like supplicating to Allah by his virtues (tawassul) or holding any gathering in his honor. These filthy people themselves will hold any number of days commemorating their filthy elders like ibn ‘abdul wahhaab, or mark their national day as a day of ‘eid, but they groan in pain if they see Muslims organizing a gathering in honor of our Master Rasulullahﷺ .

POLITICS – ALL the modern day politics in the name of “Sunni Islam” comes from this filthy sect – WHETHER it is white, like governmental relations, diplomacy, etc. or black like terrorism, indiscriminate attacks on men, women and children of the kuffaar and Muslims alike. Because of their alliance with their imperial master, America, and their hold on petroleum resources, they do enjoy some political leverage, notwithstanding that the two holy cities of Islam are under their control and so a lot of innocent Muslims too give them some form of laxity. Right now they are divided into two major divisions. One is that of their kafir-friendly scholars and leaders who are in bed with the imperialist powers of the world. They are a bit more polished and at least for the sake of diplomacy, have a presentable face, both to the kuffaar as well as Sunnis. The other division is the cabal of the jahil takfiris and terrorists maligning the name of Islam, Muslims and jihad, causing unwanted problems to innocent Muslims at the hands of the kafir media, governments, organizations, etc. due to their actions that are void of any wisdom what so ever. Both these divisions are IRRELEVANT to us Sunnis AND one way or another, BOTH these divisions within them work to the detriment of Islam and benefit the kuffaar, knowingly or unknowingly.

The scope of this piece is only to give brief descriptions of the sect and to highlight their distinguishing hallmarks. Scholars of Islam have written books refuting their heresies.

A khariji, according to Islamic literature on misguided sects, is someone who follows the khawarij in their guiding methodology, which is warring against Muslims. Hashwis are people who attribute bodily attributes to Allah.

These 2 are the major guiding ideologies of the wahabis.

The distinguishing trait of a wahabi is his blind following of ibn taymiyyah and/or ibn ‘abdul wahhaab and all those ‘scholars’ who follow these two heretics.

2-2 – The syncretist & perennialist fake sufis –

Considering our immediate times, in the aftermath of 911, this major sect of misguidance has revived itself. It should be known that syncretism and perennialism have always crept into Sufism at many points in time in history and this is not a new phenomenon. Whenever such heresies have crept into Sufism, the scholars of the Ahlus Sunnah on the ‘aqidah of the Ahlus Sunnah, who are the TRUE Sufis, have always refuted such heretics.


The wahabis are easily identifiable, because they openly declare that they do NOT follow the Ash’ari & Maturidi ‘aqaid (and thereby further worsen their position as people of bid’ah).

These people however, drape their heresy by calling themselves as Ash’ari or Maturidi and claiming to not be wahabis. They also have contradictions wherein despite claiming opposition to wahabis, they express affinities for them as they would for fellow Sunnis.

But they have bigger problems than just their affinities for wahabis in action contradicting their speech that opposes the wahabis.

They borrow some of their usul from the mu’tazila, the rafidzis, and the batinis.

The batinis, in the language of Islam, are a SEVERELY heretical sect of misguidance who think that Islam is all about the internal states. For example, when a full-on, proper batini is told that the 5 daily prayers are compulsory, he might respond by some sophistry such as “But the true prayer is that of the heart. My heart is with Allah. Hence, I do not need to offer the 5 daily prayers in outwardly actions.” – such a person is an apostate. Because of the batinis idiotic sophistry and obsession with the internal, many of them also doubt the kufr of the kafirs like christians, jews, hindus, etc. while Islam has commanded us to look at the apparent and also commanded us to manifest its commandments on the apparent, like offering the 5 daily prayers, going for Hajj, and so on.

The mu’tazila were those who adhered to i’itizal, or attributing Allah with the attributes of creation or the creation with the attributes of Allah. For example, they said that humans have a free will that is not subject to the will of Allah. The sect is defunct but many of their filthy teachings have made their way to these times.

The rafidzis, are known for their animosity to the sahaba, along with their other mu’tazilite teachings.

The false sufis have a lot of streaks from many of these sects of misguidance.

Their blasphemies based on their batini tendencies, include saying things such as:

– They say that kafirs should not be called kafirs.

– They have come up with a new terminology to please their kafir masters. They say that not all non-Muslims are kafir and hence make a distinction between ‘nonMuslim’ and ‘kafir’.

– They honor the kuffaar by addressing their elders as “his holiness” and “mother teresa” and so on.

– They pray for dead kafirs, when this is directly forbidden in the Quran. Abu talib was the kafir who was THE MOST well behaved to Islam and Muslims. He was the Prophet’s uncle who raised him, and despite being a kafir, he never hurt the blessed Prophet. Yet he died on kufr. Allah tells the Prophet to not even pray for him, in the Quran.

– They say that kafirs too might attain the Prophet’s shafa’ah, when the explicit verses of the Quran and the Prophet’s ahadith go against it.

– They don’t like to upset kafirs, so they try to draw elaborate excuses for other religions, and say that kafirs too shall enter heaven.

– They ask kafirs to pray for them.

– They call the religions of the kuffaar as ‘great religion’ or ‘great tradition’.

– They hold joint prayers with kafirs.

– They visit their temples, churches and synagogues as a sign of respect & honor for the kuffaar.

– They try to draw parallels between the religions of the kuffaar and equate them as equals to Islam.

– They consider all people of bid’ah like the wahabis and the shias, to be equal to the Ahlus Sunnah.

– They are VERY BIG on this ‘interfaith dialogue’ scene trying their level best to destroy Islam from within by honoring kufr and/or equating it to Islam.

– They claim to be on the side of ‘morality and religions’ and against ‘atheism’ thereby choosing one kufr (other religions) over another (atheism) and forgetting that ALL KUFR is ONE NATION (be it hinduism, christianity, buddhism, judaism, OR atheism, etc.)

Their most famous blasphemy based on their i’itizal, is this:

– They say that it is not intrinsically impossible for Allah’s speech to be a lie. Muslims should note that ‘not intrinsically impossible’ actually means ‘intrinsically possible’. So they are saying that it is possible for Allah’s Speech to be a lie, and we seek Allah’s refuge from their apostasy. They say that the IM-possibility of Allah’s speech to be a lie is contingent, that is, subject to a condition, and they say that this condition is that Allah chooses not to lie or that His Speech is subject to His Power.

This is due to their mu’tazilite belief wherein they believe that Allah’s Speech is something like our speech consisting of letters and sounds and bound by the dictates of time and space, and something that is emergent that starts and finishes; so they believe just as we ‘have power’ to tell a truth or lie, Allah’s speech too is subject to His Power. The Muslim belief is that Allah’s Speech is an ETERNAL attribute of His, with no beginning and no end, it is NOT confined to time and space, it is NOT letters and sounds, and does NOT go through changes, and it pertains to His Knowledge – and that IT IS ABSOLUTELY TRUTHFUL and falsehood is INTRINSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for His Speech.

Some of them call themselves Ash’ari or Maturidi but they have a rafidzi tendency, that is, they badmouth some/many sahaba and/or mujtahid scholars and elders of the Ahlus Sunnah. The greatest hallmark of such people is that they say that our Master ‘Ali is superior to our Masters the Shaykhayn, Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, ridzwan Allahi ‘alaihim ajma’een. Despite their claims to being Ash’ari or Maturidi, some of them have many rafidzi tendencies.

Recently some of the false sufis have also started doubting our father Adam as being the first human. To guise their blasphemy, they try to conjoin the Islamic belief and evolution by saying that Adam was the first human out of the process of evolution.

Muslims should note that NOT ALL of the heresies and apostasies listed above will be found in every single false sufi. Some false sufis will have some of these beliefs, while some others will have some others of these kufr beliefs. This is the most gaseous of all groups of innovation, that really has no form and is thus impossible to define other than by using the words ‘FALSE SUFI’.

But IN OUR TIMES, their SINGLE GREATEST HALLMARK is their honoring of kufr in the name of ‘interfaith dialogue’.

Syncretism and perennialism are concepts that attribute validity, honor and respect to more than one belief system. This wave of syncretism is the new-age model for a ‘spiritual’ society wherein all religions are deemed to be equal. This is spread by the political forces of the kuffaar who seek dominance over the planet and wish to crush any and every opposition to the system of kufr that comes from Islam.

Since these people are more politicians than anything else, who seek to please all people at all times, and say anything to make anyone happy, they are the hardest to identify by innocent Sunnis, but hopefully, in sha Allah, the pointers and their blasphemous beliefs and sayings listed above will help innocent Sunnis identify the swine in the skins of lambs.

Muslims should note that just because THEY are hard to define as a sect per se, it does NOT mean that WE, the Ahlus Sunnah are also hard to define. This is the PRIMARY REASON that the Ahlus Sunnah Manifesto has been written. All the points stated therein are matters of belief ACCEPTED UPON by ALL the elders and scholars of the Ahlus Sunnah over the last 14 centuries of Islam. Sunnis should use that manifesto as the litmus test to see who fits the bill of being a Muslim from the Firqatun Naajiah, the Ahlus Sunnah (the saved group from the 73 sects).  Muslims should also note that from the 72 sects of innovation, some innovators are kafirs because their innovation has reached disbelief, while other innovators are just utterly sinful Muslims because their beliefs are ugly but did not reach the level of disbelief.

POLITICS – Although these people are not confined to any one state, they have gained a lot of air time in the media because of their appeasement of kufr, in the name of ‘opposition to wahabism’. As we all know, in the aftermath of 911, the kafir media and politicians have been attacking (rightly on many counts, wrongly on others) the wahabis and the kafirs have been busy looking for ‘moderate’ Muslims, who would present a ‘version’ of Islam that makes the world of kufr happy.

So to earn duniya, these people seized the opportunity and in the name of ‘opposing wahabism’, they have duped innocent Muslims.

Being seekers of duniya, these shayaateen don’t care if their fame and material wealth comes from the kuffaar after a process of selling out on Islam. They will gladly appease any kufr and address the filthy pope as “his holiness” or add a “rahmatullahi ‘alaiha” after the name of a dead kafir lady or say that people who do not accept the prophethood of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ, are not kafirs; and the list just goes on.

These shayaateen have given the kafirs EXACTLY what they were looking for – a ‘kafir-friendly version’ of Islam – in the name of ‘Sufism’ – stabbing the teachings of the Ahlus Sunnah and the unsuspecting innocent Sunnis in the back.

Obviously, as is expected, they are welcome with open arms by the kuffaar and supported by them wholeheartedly.

This group alone is WORSE than both the wahabis and shias put together.

May Allah destroy these people.

2-3 – The shias –

These people bear a disgusting level of enmity against the blessed sahaba of the Prophet, and also most of his wives. They lead most of their lives without ghusl or ablution, in a state of janaabah (ceremonial impurity), because of the twisted meanings they extract from some verses, going against the ijma’ of the sahaba. They are notorious for their institution of mut’ah (fixed term ‘marriages’ of enjoyment) which is nothing but a legalized form of prostitution that makes a mockery of the noble Islamic institutions of marriage and family. It is no exaggeration that in their nation, the mut’ah “industry” which is run just a little different than a prostitution rink involves many high ranking shia clerics as well, has made lives miserable for many children born to such mothers.

These people, the shias, almost all claim to be descendants of the Prophet, and they do not spare their tongues from speaking ill of the sahaba or the awliyaa near and dear to the Ahlus Sunnah, EVEN IF, some such awliyaa may themselves be Sayyids (progeny of the Prophet, whom they claim to revere), like Shaykh ‘Abdul Qadir Jeylani.

They range from the simple mufaddzila, those who attribute superiority to our master ‘Ali over our masters Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, ridzwan Allahi ‘alaihim ajma’een – to the apostate batinis like the ismailis and alevis who deny even the integrals of Islam like praying and fasting.

Their usul is based on rifdz, hence they are called rafidzi. In addition to rifdz, they have many bizarre concepts from the mu’tazila as well as the batinis, and much worse. Some of them do not believe that the Quran is complete and accurate. Some others attribute human infallibility to non-prophets, while the incontrovertible belief of the Ahlus Sunnah is that ONLY & ONLY the prophets of Allah are free from sin. Yet some others attribute divinity to our master ‘Ali.

These people are easily identifiable being a distinct separate sect. However Sunnis should note that in these times, a lot of shias too, pretend to be Sunnis, to get inside Sunniism and attack it from within. The hallmark of such people is they will start to attack Islam from its very foundations, its usul. Bizarrely, just like the wahabis, they will attack the four madhhabs and their scholars, or the surest sign of all, they will slowly try to propagate the mistaken and against Sunni ijma’ (consensus) concept that our master ‘Ali is superior to our masters Abu Bakr and ‘Umar. If and when someone does such, run from him.

Some might think what is wrong with saying one companion is better than another. Please note dear brothers and sisters, that it is NOT US who is placing judgment of superiority. Astaghfirullah, we are woeful sinners, below the dust under the shoes of all of ‘Ali, Abu Bakr, and ‘Umar. The thing is that such superiority is established in the Sunnah of our master Rasulullah , AND by the consensus of the entire group of his noble sahaba, AND also strictly enforced by our master ‘Ali HIMSELF, who said he would have a person lashed if someone ever said he was superior to Abu Bakr or ‘Umar. THEREFORE, whoever propagates this concept of superiority of our master ‘Ali over our masters Abu Bakr and ‘Umar is NOT doing it out of his love for ‘Ali, but rather he is doing it ONLY & ONLY for the sake of rebellion against the Sunnah of the Prophet AND the ijma’ of the sahaba, ONLY & ONLY to be different from normal Muslims. Thus, such a person is a person of bid’ah and he is to be treated harshly by the Ahlus Sunnah.

Needless to say, the placing of ‘Ali as superior to Abu Bakr and ‘Umar is only THE MINIMUM state of a shia. They can have and many do have much more severe deviations, some of which are even kufr. (Just tafdzil of our master ‘Ali, that is, holding him superior to our masters Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, on its own is only a bid’ah, but NOT  kufr.)

POLITICS – They are known for their sinister tactics routinely abusing the trust and goodwill of the Sunnis, and this has been especially rampant in modern times, including their playing the Palestinian cause as well for their perverted intentions.

Sunnis worldwide have been informing us that shias are settling in droves in their Sunni majority countries like Malaysia, Egypt, Indonesia, Sudan, and so on, and have been running organized campaigns to bribe poor, uneducated people into converting them to shiaism, exactly the same way the filthy christian missionaries do, along with lobbying for the shia nation and promoting the interests of shiaism.

Almost all Muslim nations, as well as kafir nations with significant Muslim populations like India, Philippines, Singapore etc. now have these cells of rich shia migrants from the shia nation, mainly businessmen, who work to promote trade with their shia nation, propagate misinformation in regards to their nation & their heretical sect, and SPECIALLY promote Sunni-shia mixed marriages between Sunni women and shia men.

These people prey on not very knowledgeable Sunni females and play the “we’re all Muslims, we believe in the same thing” card, and after marriage their men bring out their true colors, locking innocent Sunni females in a life of misery if they do not convert to shiaism. Many times, despite falling for the “we’re all Muslims first, we believe in the same thing” card, even many of these less knowledgeable Sunni females see the true evils of this heretical sect, but by then it’s too late because there are children in the picture and so on. Some compromise on their faith for the sake of the marriage & the children. Others will go through hell, or a miserable exit from the marriage if they choose to save their pristine Sunni ‘aqidah after they see and realize the evils of shiaism and protest against it in front of the husband.

Recently a lot of people from the Ahlus Sunnah have yet again been falling in the trap of their sweet poison. These people have even been claiming to stand up for the Palestinian cause, and yet many Palestinians who have had firsthand experience with them have seen their evil designs. In Lebanon, a lot of Sunnis once again fell for their supposed ‘love of Muslim brothers’ against the evil terrorist nation of Israel, and yet again they have noticed that these people only and only wish to advance their ideology and influence onto the Sunnis just like the wahabis.

Very sadly, just like their arch enemy, the wahabis (the shias and wahabis hate each other’s guts), these people too enjoy some political pull in the Muslim world due to their oil-rich nation and due to their shia cells that exist in other Muslim nations who bear loyalty to the shia nation more than anything, notwithstanding the new shia cells coming up in those and other nations.

Once again, any politics relating to Islam that is not in the name of “Sunni Islam” (which is influenced by wahabis for the major part), be it through diplomacy or friendships and strategic alliances with some kafir nations, covert or overt, OR through unwise and unjustified attacks at both Muslims and kuffaar, maiming the Muslim Diaspora, is controlled by the shia.

Muslims should also note that ALMOST ALL of what the kafir media reports as “terrorism” and mass murder of innocent civilians – is perpetrated ONLY by these two groups of heresy, the wahabis and the shias.

However, they should also note that – DESPITE ALL THAT – it is STILL less horrendous than the amount of people killed by the kuffaar and their coalition. Muslims should ALWAYS remind the kuffaar that they have killed more innocent civilians – both their own kafir brethren as well as innocent Muslims – than Muslims ever have, deviant or Sunni.

4 – The semi-wahabi, semi-fake sufi, reformists

This is a new group of wannabe reformers that has come up mainly in kafir nations that have a sizable Muslim population.

For the most part, they’re EXACTLY like the second group that preceded, the fake Sufis.

The ONLY difference between these people and the fake Sufis is that these people are even bigger politicians than the fake Sufis.

While the fake Sufis claim to be Ash’ari and/or Maturidi and claim to oppose the wahabis, and the wahabis claim to follow their own methodology and oppose the Ash’aris and Maturidis – these people are all just a bunch of feel-good arbitrators who work to ‘build bridges’ between sufis (i.e., the fake ones) and wahabis.

They never state openly what their ‘aqidah is. They neither align themselves as 100% wahabi/salafi in their ‘aqidah nor do they call themselves as strictly Ash’ari or Maturidi. If they are ever asked their manhaj or ‘aqidah, they will give wishy washy answers.

This is the ONLY reason they are mentioned separately from the fake sufis, because they are even more formless and gaseous than them. While the fake sufis allege themselves to be Ash’ari/Maturidi and THEN lose all their form, these people don’t even allege themselves to be anything.

The usul, or guiding methodology they follow is a mish mash of that of the fake sufis and the wahabis.

The result – you have a bunch of juhhaal, who are greater jahils than both the wahabis and fake sufis individually.

Their idiotic rulings include saying things like men and women are allowed to shake hands or that there can be mixed prayer congregations between men and women with a woman imam.

Their distinguishing trait, just like the fake sufis – is their honoring of kufr and the kuffaar in the name of ‘interfaith dialogue’.

ANOTHER VERY IMPORTANT distinguishing trait of theirs that needs to be pointed out is their cryptic and subliminal messaging to Muslims that they are the ‘REFORMERS’ of Islam. They are smart people and know consumer psychology well. They do not directly ask people to call themselves reformers. They leave hints.

For example they will say things like, “We are living in these times when the world is different from the times of the sahaba. A lot of the reform in Islam can happen directly from within itself. I have read that we have rulings from xyz scholars on xyz controversial matter.” I will just explain how they leave their cryptic clues. Dear brothers and sisters, please note that we need to focus on the implications of their words:

COMMENT: “We are living in these times when the world is different from the times of the sahaba.”

IMPLICATION: Our times are different and therefore we need new rulings for accommodating our lifestyles.

COMMENT: “A lot of the reform in Islam can happen directly from within itself.”

IMPLICATION: Strengthening the former implication that a “reform” is needed. In fact by mentioning “can happen”, the implication is towards a call to action.

COMMENT: “I have read that we have rulings from xyz scholar of the past on xyz controversial matter.”

IMPLICATION: Here the person drops the bomb. By saying “I have read”, to the unsuspecting audience, he immediately and very subtly establishes his status as a “Shari’ah expert” (The trick – Just mention a famous classical scholar’s name and mention any book whose name the audience can’t pronounce, and you’re an expert.)

By mentioning the xyz scholar, to the unsuspecting observer, he even reiterates that he is not a deviant.

By mentioning the xyz controversial position and the xyz scholar’s book, he plays it safe and shows that it is the xyz classical scholar’s opinion and not his own.

THE CATCH: He does NOT show deliberately the half a million riders, caveats, and terms and conditions accompanying such a position.

For example, I can tell you that xyz classical scholar said that it is allowed to pray the salah naked, and the permission extends to both men and women. Believe it or not, this is a real permission in books of Islamic fiqh.

I would however, be doing a GREAT DISSERVICE to Islam and the reader if I didn’t mention the backdrop for this permission.

The permission is for a person who is shipwrecked and barely makes it alive to a piece of land, having lost all his belongings and LITERALLY even the clothes on his body. Beware that he STILL is NOT permitted to pray naked. He should gather leaves and wrap them around himself, and then pray. IF he doesn’t even find leaves, or finds them but they are poisonous leaves or there are animals that would chase him to eat the leaves and therefore injure him, THEN he is allowed to pray completely naked and such a prayer is accepted. This is NOT a situation I cooked up and came up with my own ruling. Our elders of the Ahlus Sunnah have thought about a lot of possible circumstances we can find ourselves in and given rulings for those circumstances.

How bizarre would it be if someone were to say that xyz classical scholar rules (and mind you this is a REAL ruling in fiqh) that we are allowed to pray naked and says it’s a-ok, if someone just steps out of the shower and prays naked?! Or worse yet, says that a person can join the congregation naked?! What if a person gives the following ‘logic’ – “We’re EVEN allowed to pray naked. So what’s the big deal if a woman just prays without hijab in front of men?!”

I have given an extreme example to show how these people play with the usul of Islam and prey on unsuspecting masses. These people do it in more subtle cases where innocent Muslims can’t catch them.

Many times they will state a ruling and conveniently forget to show the usul behind it OR they will give a position meant for extremely unique circumstances that are accompanied by a bunch of legal caveats, disclaimers, and riders. They either ignore proper usul or twist it to suit their whims and fancies and please the kuffaar.

MIND YOU – The fake sufis TOO play with usul or twist it, JUST LIKE TEHSE GUYS. They just state their idiocies as routine opinions, without calling for reform or presenting themselves as reformers, but IN EFFECT, are doing the exact same thing as these guys.

FINAL IMPLICATION: I am an expert. I know xyz scholars xyz books. I have just given you an exquisite example of how even the classical scholars themselves approve of xyz, and yet in these times, most Muslims follow their ‘backward’ and ‘cultural’ opinions from Muslim nations on xyz. We need reform in Islam. Therefore I am your reformer, and I have just proven my expert reformer status to you. Pay for my course at the counter, and I will show you how reform your life!

ONCE AGAIN, there is NO DIFFERENCE between their syncretism AND the syncretism of the fake sufis. These people are mentioned separately ONLY & ONLY because they do not explicitly call themselves as Ash’ari/Maturidi or wahabi/salafi, and they follow a bizarre usul taken from the bogus usuls of both the fake sufis and the wahabis. Otherwise, for all intents and purposes, they’re JUST LIKE the fake sufis and more dangerous than both the wahabis and shias put together, because of their syncretism.

POLITICS – Since their guiding principles are the same as the false sufis, whose aim is to appease the kuffaar in the name of interfaith dialogue, it both stands to reason, as well as it is shown by real life experience, that the politics pertaining to this group is also the exact same politics that pertains to the fake sufis.

The only difference is that while some fake sufis may claim to oppose wahabis in their media statements (kafir media or Muslim media), these people claim to be peacemakers and bridge-builders between the wahabis and sufis (i.e., the fake ones).

Other than that, JUST LIKE THE fake sufis – they have given the kuffaar EXACTLY what they were looking for – a kafir-friendly ‘version’ of Islam that appeases them and their systems, and they too are welcome with open arms by the kuffaar – and the kuffaar’s media, politicians, universities and institutions etc. promote these kind of people as people of ‘moderation’ and ‘reason’, of course with some thick bundles of cash funding.

2-5 – The faggotry legalizers

These people have been mentioned separately for the benefit of the reader to highlight their fitnah.

There is ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE between these people and the group that follows (No. 6 – The other zanadiq and apostates).

The reader should beware that merely engaging in homosexual sex does not make a Muslim a kafir. Homosexual sex is strictly prohibited in Islam, and if proven, punishable by death in an Islamic state.

A person who is just born with homosexual tendencies or gets lustful thoughts about people of the same gender, but does NOT engage in homosexual acts, is not even a sinful Muslim. He/she is an upright Muslim. He/she can either get married to a Muslim of the opposite gender if he/she can do justice to his/her spouse or stay celibate.

We heterosexuals are also ‘born this way’. We lust for the opposite gender. However, Allah has given us a guideline to live our life. Sex is ONLY & ONLY allowed in the confines of a marriage between a man and a woman. The people we are allowed to marry is also restricted. For example, even after death or divorce, we are not allowed to marry the son/daughter of our spouse to another man/woman – for life.

If a homosexual says he was ‘born this way’, he has NO CHOICE BUT to follow the laws of Allah and NOT engage in homosexual sex.

A Muslim who engages in homosexuality but BELIEVES it to be forbidden in Islam is a SINFUL MUSLIM.

HOWEVER, IF a person believes that there is no sin in the act of homosexuality, OR canvasses to state that gays should be allowed to be married under Islamic law, OR states that people are allowed to marry people of the same gender – SUCH A PERSON IS AN APOSTATE FROM ISLAM – just as a person who says ‘adultery is allowed’ is an apostate from Islam.


This is a well stated rule in Islam that whoever declares a certified and an expressly stated halal as haram, or vice versa, such a person is an apostate from Islam. Like for instance saying that adultery or alcohol consumption is allowed, or to say that the 5 daily salah’s are not obligatory, and so on. A person who doubts the open and blatant apostasy of such a person is himself an apostate.

There is a small lobby of this group of people who say that homosexuality is not forbidden and that gay marriages are allowed in Islam.

Needless to say, they have no ground to step on, AND most of such fags are ignoramuses who can’t even read one hadith in its proper Arabic. They just draw vvvveeeerrryyyyyyy long semantical bows, throw in their fag reasoning, and somehow try to attempt to prove that homosexuality is allowed in Islam or that gay marriages are allowed.

Needless to say, other than themselves, they don’t convince anyone else, due to explicit and expressly stated matters in Islamic literature. Although they use the same methodology of the wannabe reformers mentioned above, to twist, ignore, and manipulate basic usul of Islam, they can’t even get the wannabe modernist reformers on their side.

Their distinguishing characteristics — Well, isn’t it obvious?

POLITICS – As would be expected, these apostate faggots are supported wholeheartedly by the LGBT lobby and the kuffaar’s media and politicians, although the support from the kuffaar’s media and the politicians is a bit controlled and measured, because open support of this apostate fag group would mean alienating the mainstream Muslim community. They can’t even get their puppets from the above mentioned 4 groups to directly support this group because, the prohibition on homosexuality in Islam is so widely known (as if common sense wasn’t enough!) amongst the masses that any ‘scholar’ who supports this group would be alienated by the masses of Muslims. That is PRECISELY why even the fourth group of wannabe modernists and reformers wouldn’t dare openly support this filthy group. For the most part they only get their support from the gay lobby, plus of course the various governmental and other NGO funding from the kuffaar.

They are irrelevant for now as far as mainstream Muslims at large are concerned, but seeing the deteriorating situation with the amount of enemies growing within Islam and the support of the kuffaar for them, one shouldn’t be surprised if this group gains some footage in the future.

Knowing about them before hand and having mentioned them separately, in sha Allah, it is hoped that the reader will keep his eyes and ears open and cautious against these filthy enemies of Islam.

It should be noted that apostates & zanadiq are WORSE kafirs than original kafirs, that is, those kafirs born in kafir homes. These people deserve harsh treatment from Muslims and a total boycott.

While with original kafirs, one is allowed to engage in worldly matters like trade transactions, neighborhood cooperation for worldly matters, etc. and to be nice to them without being their friends – it is ABSOLUTELY HARAM to have any dealing what so ever, with an apostate, if a Muslim is aware that someone is an apostate from Islam.

2-6 – Other zanadiq and apostates

A zindiq is someone who CLAIMS to be Muslim and even internally, thinks to himself that he is a Muslim, but he espouses beliefs that are PURE KUFR. Zanadiq is the plural of zindiq.

In the Shari’ah zanadiq enjoy the same status and rulings as the munafiqiin (the hypocrites in religion). The only difference between a zindiq and munafiq is that a munafiq internally knows full well that he is a kafir and on the side of kufr, while the zindiq fools himself into thinking he is on the side of Islam. Obviously apostates are those who turn back from Islam. They too are the lowest of the kuffaar like the zanadiq and the munafiqin.

While certain apostates are solitary entities, like for example, the accursed shaytan rushdie, some apostates/zanadiq to operate as a group/sect, some of them very powerful even. One example of the faggotry legalizers was given above.

Here are some more popular ones:

6.1 – The Quranists – These buffoons are the spiritual offspring of the wahabis, even if the wahabis deny it, they are the pioneers of this mantra of “every man does his own ijtihad”. Only these people, the Quranists, are that much worse than the wahabis. While the wahabis came up with the mantra to effectively disregard all ahadith as lies, unless they were classified as sahih (in these times by their poster-boy, the filthy heretic, naasiruddin albani), these morons went a step ahead and disregarded all of hadith altogether. They say that all hadith is nothing but Chinese whispers and only the Quran is to be followed.

For the most part, they are ignorant morons. NONE of them understand proper Arabic, and rely on their whims in interpreting English translations (which are SIMPLY NOT enough to deduce any worthy juridical ruling) of the Quran or what narrational knowledge is in Islam. This one question is enough to challenge them: Who brought hadith to you and who brought the Quran to you?

Blanket rejection of all ahadith is apostasy and these people are apostates and/or zanadiq. A confused RECENT convert/revert to Islam won’t be ruled an apostate but taught the basics of Islam, but otherwise, there are no two opinions that these people are ALL apostates and zanadiq.

These people do not hide their identity. You will know a Quranist when you come across one, and 9.9 times out of 10, he/she will be an argumentative airhead more than anything.

POLITICS – They seem to be a fan club of a few pockets of idiots here and there, more than anything, but they do seem to be cropping up every now and again, so it’s best if they are mentioned so that the readers are aware. For the most part, they would be irrelevant to most mainstream Muslims. However, DO NOT be surprised if you see them too get the backing of the kuffaar as ‘moderates’ or something or paraded and promoted left, right and center on some talk shows to boost their ratings. The enmity to Islam in these times, both covert & overt, is at the most unprecedented level in all of human history.

6.2 – The qadianis – The more anyone condemns this filthy group of apostates, the less it is. This filthy group believes in a minor dajjal, a filthy impostor, a false prophet ‘mirza ghulam ahmad’ as a prophet. This human garbage, the mirza, was born in British India in the 1800’s and first claimed to be the awaited Imam Mehdi, then claimed to be the prophet ‘Eisa, ‘ala nabiyyina wa ‘alaihimus salam, and then claimed to be a prophet. He was a stooge of the british empire and even his ‘religious teachings’ incorporate an element of servitude to the british empire and he even said that to disobey the queen of england was to disobey Allah, and we seek Allah’s refuge from this filth.

For the most part, this group is concentrated in the indian subcontinent, and as expected, in the UK, by people of indian-Pakistani heritage. However, these satanists have been trying their level best to spread their filthy religion in places like Senegal and other African nations, amongst the poor people by the same old trick of the christian missionaries – bribing and offering monetary gifts.

Their SECT* is called ‘qadiani’ or ‘mirzai’ by Muslims. They refer to themselves as ‘ahmadi’, or their sect as the ‘ahmadiyyah’.

They are divided into two subgroups – one considers the mirza as a prophet, while the other doesn’t consider him a prophet but rather as a reformer.

THEY ARE FILTHY APOSTATES who deny the finality of the messengerhood of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ, the VERY FOUNDATION OF ISLAM.

Marriage to these satanists is haram for BOTH Muslim men AND women, and whoever thinks it is allowed, he commits kufr. Any meat slaughtered by them is forbidden to be consumed by a Muslim, as these satanists are neither Muslims nor people of the book. It is haram to show them any affinity or to say the salam to them. These people are satanists and deserve nothing less than a full boycott from a Muslim if we can help it. They deserve a harsher treatment than original kafirs.

A person who EVEN DOUBTS that they are apostate kafirs, is HIMSELF a kafir. (That is, someone who knows about them. A LOT of western converts & born Muslims haven’t even heard about them or who/what they are. Obviously, the ruling applies to those who know about these people and yet deny that they are kafirs.)

*Muslims should just not that ‘Mirza’ is also a popular Muslim family surname in the subcontinent. Most common Muslims have nothing to do with these satanists. ‘Ahmadi’ is also a popular family name/surname amongst Arab Muslims. So please, do not think ill of any brother/sister who possesses these names in the name/surname. It does NOT imply that the person is a qadiani, by any stretch.

At times, these satanists do not hide their identity and confidently state that they are qadiani/ahmadiyyah/mirzai.

At other times, they conceal their identity and pretend to be Muslims like us and outwardly behave like us in prayers and so on.

POLITICS – From their inception, until the present times, the british crown has been especially cozy with them. They also have substantial support from other kuffaar nations like canada and america. They have a very strong lobbying force in england. The british and other kafir media love to call these satanists as a ‘Muslim group’ and back them wholeheartedly.

6.3 – The ismailis – These filthy apostates are the worst of all shias. They like to call themselves ‘shia imami ismaili’. They do not believe salah to be compulsory. They do not believe hajj to be compulsory. They believe it is ok for Muslims to marry anyone of any faith, be they men or women, or be they hindu or buddhist or christian or jew. They attribute divinity and infallibility to their imams. Their current ‘imam’ and ‘spiritual head’ is a so called ‘prince’ karim agha khan, a wealthy, indulgent magnate who lives in europe and his word is law for these fools. They believe that it is he who will decide how many times they need to pray and so on. He is known for his lavish and indulgent lifestyle, gambling on horses, and all the stuff the kafir elite of europe are known for. They are full on batinis. They believe that Islam is all about esotericism and has nothing to do with the external. They like to call themselves Muslim, but they are zanadiq.

Imam Al-Ghazali, rahimahullah, was one of the greatest and most vociferous warriors against zandaqa, ESPECIALLY of these batinis.

For the most part, they themselves stay aloof from Muslims and stick to their own kind. Just like the faggotry legalizers, and the qadianis, these apostates too love to mingle with the kuffaar and rub shoulders with them. They love the limelight in front of the [mainstream] kuffaar and will say anything and/or do anything to make the kuffaar (i.e., the mainstream kuffaar like christians, jews, atheists, etc.) happy, including saying things like kuffaar too shall enter heaven, or saying things like ‘all religions lead to the same truth’ and so on. They love to draw parallels between Islam and kufr like Buddhism and look for common grounds between Islam and kufr.

They can be easily identified if they show their true colors and state what their religion states. Their followers are mainly from india, Pakistan, iran, Afghanistan, and parts of Iraq, Syria and Yemen, notwithstanding their presence in western europe, united states, and some African nations.

If they choose to hide their faith and camouflage it and pretend to be Muslim, then, well we really won’t know till we get an indication as to who they are.

POLITICS – The people themselves are an extremely wealthy community AND their ‘imams’ from the agha khan family are also the same, at par to the rich oil sheikhs of the Arabian Gulf. Their ‘imam’ karim agha khan also enjoys lobbying power and a lot of political pull with the government, media, and business establishments of Europe, considering his minority community.

To support their organization and enjoying the fruits of being a very small minority, they have extremely well organized and well structured community programs in place to support their community in any way possible. This includes, ‘think tanks’, universities, community trusts and cooperative societies, and so on, pertaining to their community and religion – including of course, enjoying the funding and endowments from the kuffaar’s governments, media, universities and so on and enjoying extremely cozy relationship with the kuffaar through their various strategic partnerships with them.

They are highly professional in their approach, well managed, and well organized, and work hand in hand with the kuffaar. If you read a research paper written by an agha khani ‘intellectual’, you will be mesmerized at the choice of his poetic language, his presentation, publishing quality and so on, and yet all of it will include pure kufr. As the Quran says, the hypocrites will have beautiful faces, and will talk beautifully and woo people with their mannerisms, and yet, they will be like unsupported logs of wood leaning against a wall.

PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND DEAR BROTHER/SISTER – NEVER EVER EVER lend even half an ear to anything “Islamic” that comes out of the following:

the agha khan foundation

the agha khan university

the institute of ismaili studies

AND/OR ANY PERSON, ENTITY OR ORGANIZATION affiliated in ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM to anything that has the words “agha khan” or “ismaili” in it.

If ANY person or organization or entity is funded by ‘prince’ karim agha khan OR anybody affiliated to ‘agha khan’ or ‘ismailis’ – BE SURE DEAR BROTHER/SISTER – that such a person, organization or entity is supremely ignorant at best OR has sold out on Islam – AND IS SIMPLY INCAPACITATED TO WORK FOR THE CAUSE OF ISLAM.

Any author that shares a book with an ismaili author, be sure that he is an enemy of Islam.

Two of the GREATEST FITNAHS in Islam in our times are the ismaili authors, reza shah kazemi and hossein nassr.

These shayaateen also write on “Sufism” and claim to practice it, when in fact Sufism is pure and alienated from the filthy teachings of these men. PLEASE NOTE, dear brothers and sisters, that there is NO SUFISM without the ‘aqidah of the ahl al-haqq (the people of the truth), the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah. SUFI SCHOLARS have said that a person ignorant of the shari’ah (the right ‘aqidah and fiqh) who claims “sufism” is NOTHING BUT a stooge of the devil. BEAR WELL IN MIND – that Imam Al-Ghazali, an ACCOMPLISHED SUFI – HAS WARNED in his Ihya and the Kimya-e-Sa’adat to STAY AWAY from JAHIL SUFIS (that is, ignorant fools who like to call themselves sufi). For the most part, these apostates take their tasawwuf from orientalist translations by the kuffaar, who don’t have a single clue of what Sufism is. Sufism is learnt at the hands of a man of the right ‘aqidah, who strives his best to practice the Shari’ah to the dot, not outright kuffaar, and zanadiq like these ismailis reading a book or writing long winded rubbish essays on “Sufism”. Also note, that A LOT of books on Sufism are also corrupted and tampered with by the jahil sufis. Sufism is a HIGHLY PRACTICAL & PERSONAL SCIENCE that is passed on from rightful scholars through student to teacher interaction and not through books.

BE SURE that ANY person who supports or praises these shayaateen as ‘Islamic scholars’ or ‘men of Islam’ or so on – then such a person HIMSELF is ONE OF THEM – EVEN IF he claims Sunnism on the outside or claims to be a ‘scholar’ of Sunnism or Sufism or anything.

In recent times, A LOT of both western as well as some Arab “scholars” who claim to be Ash’aris, Maturidis, Hanafis, Shafi’iys, Sufis etc. are joining hands with the ismailis and working together with them.

This is a VERY STRANGE and UNPRECEDENTED development for us, needless to say TERRIBLY HURTFUL TO THE CAUSE OF ISLAM AND THE AHLUS SUNNAH. In the last 50-100 years, for the most part, these shayaateen have kept only to themselves, but now they are forming strategic alliances with some fake sufis. It may well be that the fake sufis have themselves sought riches and fame and funding from these shayaateen, because their aim is not the ridza of Allah, but rather seeking worldly fame and riches using and abusing Islam and the trust of innocent Muslims.

Please bear in mind dear brothers and sisters, if someone is ignorant of this sect and people like reza shah kazemi or hossein nassr, it is OUR JOB to inform them of the repugnant beliefs of these zanadiq.

VERY SADLY & IRONICALLY, A LOT of those fake sufis who are joining hands with the ismailis and batinis, also claim to be followers of the noble Imam Al-Ghazali, while the Imam Al-Ghazali fought tooth and nail against these filthy zanadiq shayaateen.

The syncretist and perennialist streaks that are found in the fake sufis, take their usul from these shayaateen, the batinis.

I repeat once again, NEVER in the history of Islam, has the Ahlus Sunnah been attacked from SO MANY different fronts ALL AT ONCE.

In any case – we are Muslims and we believe in Allah’s promise. His promise is to help the sincere. We ask Him for sincerity and His help, without which we shall perish.

Needless to say, this group too is absolutely adored by the kafir media, politicians and so on.

6.4 – The alevis – These zanadiq are the most disgraceful lot of the shias just like the ismailis in their beliefs, neglecting main obligations of Islam like prayers, fasting etc. They just happen to be a different organization to them, in terms of organizational and infrastructure matters, at least outwardly. Most of them even attribute divinity to our master ‘Ali and even hold him superior to the Prophet himself, and we seek Allah’s refuge from their blasphemy.

POLITICS – They do enjoy an elite social status and business power in Turkey. The rulers of Syria, the al-assads’ and the ba’ath party is controlled by alevis. Being an extreme sub-sect of the shias, as we all know, they, the Syrian regime, enjoy a great political pull and leverage with the shi’ite iran. They are also overt supporters of the 12’er shia rafidzi organization, the hezbush-shaytan (the so called ‘hezbollah’) in Lebanon, where the innocent Sunnis let them in their heart thinking that they would work for the benefit of Lebanon and fight against the filthy terrorist nation of israel. However, since history has a habit of repeating itself, the shias proved once again that they damn care about the welfare of Lebanon as a nation or “their Sunni brethren” but rather only for their loyalty to their alevi government next door in Syria, and their 12’er leaders in iran. Their atrocities against the Ahlus Sunnah, both to life and property of innocent Sunnis, their political thuggery in Lebanon, AND their attacking the Ahlus Sunnah ideologically is well documented by the Sunnis.

They also have some political pull with some kafir nations too. Overtly at least the western world for the most part seems to be opposed to Syria and iran, but we all know how iran-contra worked out.

6.5 – The baha’is – They are also batinis who reject Islam and believe in the validity of all religions. They follow an accursed false prophet from iran, who was called bahaullah. They acknowledge themselves as a separate faith, and the Muslims too consider them kafirs. They are mentioned here, just so innocent Muslims not aware of this group knows about them. They are quite chummy with the ismailis at times since they’re all batinis; and just like the ismailis they too at times claim to be affiliated to “Sufism”.

POLITICS – The author doesn’t know much about their politics since they are a very small community, even smaller than the ismailis. However, they do enjoy a great deal of love and respect from kafir governments and the media.

Considering the unprecedented levels at which Islam is being attacked now, both overtly and covertly, from the outside as well as the inside – don’t be surprised if tomorrow these people are also lauded as “authorities” and “scholars” on Islam, like how the ismailis are by the fake sufis and the media.

NOTE TO SUNNIS REGARDING THE ZANADIQ AND APOSTATES – the faggotry legalizers, the Quranists, the qadianis, the alevis, the ismailis, the baha’is and other zanadiq or apostates.


PLEASE NOTE – These people are NEITHER Muslims, NOR people of the book.

It is HARAM to marry their MEN OR WOMEN.

ANY marriage to such people is null and void as far as the Shari’ah is concerned, and the children born, will be children of zina, that is, illegitimate children.

Their slaughter is HARAM to be consumed.

Please bear this well in mind.


3 – A Humble Plea To All Sunnis –

Brothers, Sisters, Community Leaders, Educators, Imams, Institutions, Organizations & Groups, ANY Sunni Person or Entity


The people described in the foregoing section are people of bid’ah and/or apostates. This has a few implications for us from an Islamic perspective, at both personal, as well as societal levels. Let us have a look at them:

PERSONAL – This primarily relates to a few fronts:

a)     Marriages

b)    Inter-personal friendships & relations, socializing etc.

c)     Inter-personal interactions (workplace, buying, selling, talking to customer service people etc.)

d)     Eating their slaughter

Firstly dear brothers and sisters, we MUST note a VERY important point:

A person of bid’ah is only a sinful Muslim and not a kafir apostate UNLESS his bid’ah reaches apostasy.

We must also note that not all apostasy rulings apply on new Muslims as they are in the learning phase of Islam, UNLESS it is a matter of CLEAR denial of Islam itself, like denying that Allah is One, he is not a body in a location like His creation, He has no limits, or denying that Prophet Muhammad is his last Messenger ﷺ, or that the daily 5 prayers are obligatory or denying that homosexuality is forbidden in Islam, or denying the obligation to go for Hajj, or believing that other religions are also truthful or not considering other religions as wrong and lowly and so on. Especially in kafir nations, the new Muslim might not have access to Allah-fearing scholars of Islam.

With that stated, let us look at the personal issues for Muslims in dealing with people of bid’ah.

a)     The marriage of a Sunni to a person of bid’ah is valid IF his bid’ah does not reach apostasy. If it has reached apostasy, then the marriage is null and void and any children born to such a marriage are illegitimate according to Islam, for Islam does NOT recognize a marriage between a Muslim and an apostate.

b)    Inter-personal friendships and relations are to be discarded with the people of bid’ah. As Muslims, our job is to love for Allah’s sake and to hate for His sake alone. We hate bid’ah. If a person just confines himself to bid’ah but doesn’t call others to it, he can be kindly advised to adhere to the ways of the Ahlus Sunnah. If a person calls others to bid’ah as well, he must be rebuked hard. As for those whose bid’ah has reached apostasy, no relation is allowed with him.

c)     Inter-personal interactions like buying & selling, communicating at the workplace, and so on, are allowed with people of bid’ah, but they too are HARAM with apostates, if a Muslim can help it (in a kafir nation, for example, a Muslim may not be in a position to completely boycott an apostate at all times and places). Muslims should note that Islam permits inter-personal transactions with ORIGINAL kafirs, those born in kafir homes – but forbids them to apostates. An apostate and a zindiq is the absolute worst form of a kafir, lower than an original kafir.

d)     Eating the slaughter is permitted if the slaughterer is a sinner or a person whose bid’ah hasn’t reached apostasy. As for apostates, their slaughter is carrion and HARAM to be consumed by a Muslim, EVEN IF, they say the Bismillah, UNLESS & UNTIL they go back on their apostasy and become Muslims. This will be the case even for an apostate who leaves Islam and becomes christian or jew. An apostate is NOT ruled a person of the book, EVEN IF, he converts to christianity or judaism.

As you can see, the best and the safest course of action is to leave the people of bid’ah alone and not mingle with them, if one wants to protect his/her Islam. These are the people who call us to hellfire. Hadith calls the people of bid’ah as dogs of hellfire.

POLITICAL – This is an area where Sunnis suffer miserably in these times.

Dear Sunni, we make up roughly 70-80% of the Muslim world’s population with the wahabis and shias only being a mere 10-15% each.

The false sufis and the reformists hardly make up a percentage, for the most part, them being filthy shayaateen who have sold out on their deen, and wish to call other innocent Muslims to bid’ah and/or kufr. However, all they achieve is to confuse uneducated and new Muslims only for a certain period of time, until these innocent Muslims snap out of the confusion and the self-contradictory filthy teachings of such shayaateen and align themselves with the beliefs of the Ahlus Sunnah. They are increasing rapidly in our times, due to the backing of their kafir masters, and these group MUST BE nipped in the bud

It is true, we do not have a state that dedicatedly works for our cause and as such do not enjoy the kind of state backings that the wahabis and the shias do. But dear brothers and sisters, we MUST do the hard yards for ascertaining our position and influence, for the sake of the deen. We SIMPLY CAN’T ride on the politics of the shias and the wahabis. These people are KNOWN to stab Islam and Muslims in the back. The wise learn from history, not let it repeat itself.

So many times, Sunnis have been EXPLOITED and SANDWICHED in the feud between these two filthy sects of bid’ah. So many times we have see Sunnis politically aligning themselves with the wahabis to counter the evil perpetrated by the kuffaar and/or the shia, only to be used, abused, exploited and stabbed in the back by the wahabis and have our manhaj attacked and poisoned by these wahabi crooks. Other times, they have politically aligned themselves with the shias, in order to counter the evil perpetrated by the kuffaar and/or the wahabis, only to be used, abused, exploited and stabbed in the back by the shias and have our ‘aqidah and manhaj attacked and poisoned by these shia offspring of mut’ah “marriages”.

Please note dear Sunni, that there is NO SUCH THING as a free ride or a free lunch. The evils of politically aligning ourselves with the wahabis OR the shias are too much to be listed. Islam teaches us to be PROACTIVE for our cause, not to tag along onto somebody else’s cause, hoping that some good will come out of it to our cause too. We NEED the proactive, straightforward, and clean politics of our master ‘Umar, radzi Allahu ‘anhu, and triple divorce ourselves from tagging along onto the politics played by the shias and the wahabis. Everything these two people have EVER done, they have harmed Islam and Muslims by it and aided the kuffaar, knowingly or unknowingly, deliberately or unwittingly.

Again, it is true that we do not enjoy the financial and political leverage that these two groups of bid’ah enjoy. However, we form the majority of the world’s Muslim population. With dedicated proactiveness and reliance on Allah alone, we are sure to receive Allah’s help. These are not just words. It is Allah’s promise.

ALL our businesses, media organizations, political bodies, individuals etc. MUST distance themselves from the shia and the wahabi and forge NO ALLIANCE with these people. There is NO SUCH THING as a “strategic alliance” between Sunnah and bid’ah or between Islam and kufr. There are just protocols and terms of engagement.

ALL THOSE who align themselves with these two groups of bid’ah or the others like the kafir false sufis who degrade Islam at “interfaith dialogues” and “joint prayer sessions” – will GUARANTEEDLY hurt the cause of Islam, Muslims and the Ahlus Sunnah.

As stated, the false sufis and modernists are thus far a miniscule minority of kafirs pretending to be scholars, but they are working very hard to spread their kufr and pull innocent Muslims to their side.

ALL those people, who align themselves with such shayaateen are treading very dangerous grounds in regards to their faith. These shayaateen have already sold out on Islam by joining “interfaith prayer groups” equating Muslim dhikr chants of “Allahu akbar” to the christian filth of praying in the name of “father, son and holy spirit”.

PLEASE DEAR SUNNI – use your conscience well and alienate yourselves from such people who seek to equate Islam with kufr, or worse yet, seek to honor and glorify kufr.

A few minutes on the microphone, a few minutes on the stage, a few minutes in the spotlight are NOT worth selling out on everlasting bliss in the hereafter. These shayaateen have sold out on Islam for the sake of a few moments of fame, glory and a few sums of dollars from kafir governments or their puppet regimes, and zanadiq like the agha khan foundation.

ASK YOURSELF: Did our masters Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uthman, and ‘Ali, radzi Allahu ‘anhum, initiate any form of “interfaith dialogue” and “joint Muslim-christian prayer sessions” with the kuffaar?

What does Islam say about uplifting and honoring kufr?

What do our elders say about honoring kuffaar by addressing their leaders as “your holiness” or “mother” or visiting their temples, churches, and synagogues for the purpose of honoring them?

Does the Quran not tell us to tell the christians to “don’t say three”? How then is the cause of Islam helped if the filthy pope, the leader of those professing the trinity, addressed as “your holiness”?


If both Islam and buddhism are “great traditions” then why do we even bother to call them to Islam?


Please wake up dear Sunni, and see these servants of the kuffaar for who they really are. Just because they have donned the cloaks of scholarship, and might have even associated with a few unsuspecting senior scholars, it does NOT mean that these people are free of error or that they can’t sell out on their deen or apostatize. Allah warns even sahaba in numerous places in the Quran, to be weary and careful that they do not become kafir again after becoming Muslims.

WHY, THEN – O SUNNI – do you believe that these people are beyond error or deviancy or kufr?

FOR ALLAH’s SAKE – USE THE MIND ALLAH GAVE YOU – and see the charades that these shayaateen have put up and the games that these servants of the kuffaar are playing, and see just how hard they are working to somehow give the message that Islam is equal to kufr like hinduism, or buddhism, or christianity or judaism and so on – ALL in the name of “interfaith dialogue” and “communal harmony” and “peace”!

Allah tells clearly in the Quran – THE ONLY religion acceptable before Allah is Islam.


4 – Some Basic Questions & Answers

Q: What is the Ahlus Sunnah Manifesto? Is it an outline of the Sunni beliefs?

A: The Ahlus Sunnah Manifesto isn’t an outline of Sunni beliefs per se. It is a collation of the most crucial and important faith, belief, and usul (foundational principles) related matters of the Ahlus Sunnah that are being attacked from all fronts, by the open and the secret enemies of Islam.

So almost all of these crucial matters that are being attacked and where innocent Muslims are being pulled towards ignorance, confusion, bid’ah, and kufr – have been collated in one place. Sunnis can use this manifesto to gauge the Sunni-ness of any individual, organization or entity that operates under the banner of “Islam” or “Ahlus Sunnah” or “Ash’ari” or “Maturidi” or “Sufi” or anything. Call it the “Sunni-meter” if you will.

As stated in the manifesto, A LOT of the servants of the kuffaar also call themselves “Ash’ari” or “Maturidi” and innocent Sunnis can be fooled by these shayaateen.

Q. Are all the positions stated in the manifesto the Ash’ari & Maturidi positions and those based on the fiqh of the 4 madhhabs (for jurisprudential matters like celebrating the Mawlid)?

A. Yes.

Q. I am a new Muslim. You have overwhelmed me with the information and the technical terms regarding misguided sects in the second part of this article following the manifesto. How do I understand it all?

A. Dear brother/sister, please just acquaint yourself well with the Ash’ari/Maturidi creed, which is the creed of the Ahlus Sunnah and stick to the manifesto. Don’t worry about understanding everything that is mentioned in the second part. It will come to you naturally as your Islamic knowledge grows.

THIS is the primary reason for drafting the manifesto in the first place – SO THAT average, everyday Muslims know WHAT IS A SUNNI.

Think of it this way – let’s say someone wishes to buy a gold necklace with a diamond pendant and he/she has an idea in regards to what is gold and what is diamond BUT at the same time, there is a possibility that he can also be cheated by counterfeits sold by conmen who have all set up shop claiming to sell real gold and diamonds.

Then the best course of action is to firstly give this person ALL the sure fire indicators to what is REAL GOLD & REAL DIAMOND.

And then give him/her some indicators as to some popular counterfeit items.

EVEN IF this person is overwhelmed by the amount of information in regards to what is NOT REAL gold & diamond, since this list is very large – he still can’t miss because he knows what IS REAL gold and diamond, as this information is very specific and concise.

Now think of the ‘aqidah of the Ahlus Sunnah as the REAL gold & diamond. In these times of fitnah, which is over run by counterfeiters, the manifesto gives a person sure-fire indicators and identifiers as to what is a Sunni and who is a person who ONLY CLAIMS to be a Sunni, but in reality is either a person of bid’ah or an apostate or a zindiq.

So in sha Allah, just reading the very first part, and understanding it well, while just running through the second part, and proceeding on to the next sections, shall be more than enough in sha Allah.

Q. Are ALL the people you mentioned in the bubble diagram, different sects?

A. The wahabis are a homogeneous sect that is predominantly khariji. The shias, specially the 12’ers, are a homogeneous sect that is predominantly rafidzi. The others are not homogeneous sects per se. For example, there is no such “sect” that is called “fake sufi”. One fake sufi might belong to the mu’tazilite sect who believes that Allah’s speech is sounds, and letters. Another fake sufi might be a syncretist who belongs to the batini sect where he believes that other religions are honored.

I have only grouped together the various different deviants as best and as concisely as I can, considering the circumstances of our immediate times.

Q. Are all the people belonging to the groups shown in the bubble diagram and described in the second part kafirs?

A. No, not all are kafirs. Some are, some aren’t. In the case of groups 5 (faggotry legalizers) and 6 (other zanadiq and apostates like ismailis, qadianis, etc.), yes they are all kafirs and zanadiq and apostates.

As for the wahabis and the shias – some of them are kafirs and some are not kafirs.

The fake sufis and the modernist reformers are not a homogeneous and a distinctly defined sect to start with. I have just grouped a bunch of deviants into a category. Some of these people are kafirs and some are just mubtadi’ (people of bid’ah).

Q. Which ones are kafirs and which ones are not?

A. This is a very detailed question that requires going into individual beliefs and stating which belief/saying/action is kufr and which is not.

For example, with the shias, the belief that our master ‘Ali is superior to our masters Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, radzi Allahu ‘anhum, is NOT kufr. However, the filthy belief that our master ‘Umar was a hypocrite, is pure kufr and apostasy.

With the wahabis, just stating that the Mawlid is impermissible, on its own, is a matter of faulty jurisprudence, but it’s NOT kufr. However, the belief that Allah is a physical body with limits is pure kufr.

With the fake sufis and the modernist “reformers”, the belief that Ahlus Sunnah and shia are equal may not be kufr, depending on what they imply by such a statement. However, stating or implying that Islam and christianity are equally great, or doubting christians, jews, hindus, etc. to be kafirs – is pure apostasy from Islam.

In general the fake sufis are a greater evil than both the wahabis and the shias together, because they claim to be Ash’ari & Maturidi or Sufi, followed by the modernist “reformers”.

Q. You haven’t mentioned any names of who the “fake sufi scholars” are, despite calling them the most dangerous enemies of Islam. Why?

A. People sometimes have affinities to a personality more than what the personality stands for. So mentioning names of personalities at times, causes people to be blinded to the right and the wrong of a concept and focus only on the personality, and even blindly defend the personality. It’s best if we speak about beliefs, actions, and sayings.

I have mentioned a few wahabi personalities because they are the well-known hallmark of their methodology, and also some apostate ismaili personalities so Sunnis beware of those who associate themselves with those personalities. Mentioning any more, would be a chaos talk about personalities, and history and he said, she said and so on, more than BELIEFS/ACTIONS/SAYINGS OF THE AHLUS SUNNAH.

Our aim is ONLY & ONLY to propagate the BELEIFS/ACTIONS/SAYINGS of the Ahlus Sunnah AND TO NEGATE the beliefs/actions/sayings of the ahlul bid’ah and the zanadiq. This is sufficient for achieving our aim with Allah’s help.

Q. I have seen a famous personality’s video on youtube or read his article on the internet and the person espouses a belief/action/saying of kufr. Can I call him kafir?

A. Silence on the personality is a good option. In Islam, the ONLY ACCEPTABLE evidence to establish someone’s kufr is to either personally witness it or to have two reliable upright adult male Muslim witnesses. Websites and emails can be hacked. Books routinely have printing errors. Videos can be doctored, etc.

ALSO, don’t forget that the person might have a large following with innocent Muslims OR that his saying/action/belief of kufr may not be very famous. By saying something negative against the person, you might cause fitnah amongst innocent Muslims causing him to defend the personality and defend his kufr, who would otherwise not even know of the famous personality’s position of kufr.

We must not forget our AIM – to propagate the BELIEFS/SAYINGS/ACTIONS of the Ahlus Sunnah and to negate the beliefs/sayings/actions of bid’ah/kufr.

Just stating the rules of Islam regarding specific beliefs/actions/sayings is enough. Giving a ruling on a pinpointed specific person claiming to be a Muslim, is a more serious matter and a very tedious job, for a mufti.

Use your wisdom and if the matter is serious and the kufr is spreading, communicate the Ahlus Sunnah position to the leaders and elders and state who is stating what kufr and let them take appropriate action.

Q. Is it possible for some famous ‘scholars’ to be ‘swine in the skin of lamb’ as you say? Some such people might have studied at xyz university or have an ijaza from xyz shaykh respected by all people, with a direct chain to great imams of hadith/fiqh and so on.

A. No one’s chain is stronger than the sahaba who were directly connected to the Prophet ﷺ. Yet Allah warns them (the command extending to all believers) to be careful not to fall into kufr after becoming Muslims.

Having an ijaza from a good person or being associated with a good person is NOT a guarantee of Islam. Being an upright Muslim at one point in time is NOT a guarantee of staying that way in the future. In Islamic history, even scholars with ijaza’s from good people have gone astray.

The Prophet ﷺ has said that some people will do good deeds that take one to heaven, all the way until a small time before their death, when they will do a bad deed that takes them to hellfire and they shall die as people of hellfire, while some people will do bad deeds that take one to hellfire, until a small time before their death, and they shall do a good deed that takes them to heaven and die as people of heaven. The wheel is ALWAYS turning. We must ALWAYS guard our faith.

Being born in a Muslim family or having converted to Islam is NOT a guarantee that one will die also as a Muslim. We must ALWAYS guard our faith, and have been commanded such by our Master Rasulullah ﷺ.

As for associations with good shaykhs and awliyaa, whose association is better than our Master Rasulullah ﷺ?! No one’s. Did hypocrites not make their way to his blessed mosque and gatherings at certain times?

The bottom line:-

Our judgment criteria are – SHARI’AH – SHARI’AH – SHARI’AH – and MORE SHARI’AH (‘aqidah & fiqh of the Ahlus Sunnah)

Popularity, educational degrees, ijaza’s, associations with pious awliyaa and studying at their feet, NONE OF THESE are judgment criteria in Islam.

As for universities, in any case, a PhD from a university run by kafirs in a kafir nation doesn’t count for anything in Islam. The ONLY ACCEPTABLE propagators and bearers of Islamic knowledge in the Shari’ah are MUSLIMS.

Q. What if some of these people themselves are awliyaa who display karaamaat?

A. Displaying a karamah is NOT a condition to be judged as a waliy of Allah in His Court.

Please brush up on your ‘aqidah and read on what is istidraj. The Prophet ﷺ has informed us of EVEN a CERTIFIED KAFIR like the dajjal displaying many paranormal feats. Black magic is also manifested at the hands of certain mushrikeen like hindus.

Once again, our criteria are – SHARI’AH – SHARI’AH – SHARI’AH – and MORE SHARI’AH (‘aqidah & fiqh of the Ahlus Sunnah).

If a pious person on the rightful ‘aqidah of the Ahlus Sunnah and following the rightful fiqh of one of Ahlus Sunnah’s 4 madhhabs, displays a super-normal feat, it is a manifestation of Allah’s mercy on him and a gift from Allah.

But if a person is a person of bid’ah or a kafir, a paranormal feat at his hands is nothing but an insult from Allah and such a person may grow in his obstinacy, arrogance and rejection thinking he is on the right path, until he meets his doom and realizes what he really was!

Also know that EVEN PROPHETS of Allah refused to display miracles (mu’jizat) when they were teaching the Shari’ah, despite having been given voluntary control over their mu’jizat, that is they could display a miracle as and when they wanted – unlike the awliyaa who may at times unknowingly display a karamah and have no control over them, they only get karaamaat from Allah [from their human perspective] randomly.

Also note that it is well possible for a pious waliy of high standing in front of Allah to have ZERO karaamaat.

Q. What if some of them are descendents of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ?

A. Descendents of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ are the crowns of our heads and the apple of our eyes – AS LONG AS THEY ARE MUSLIM.

If a person’s bid’ah reaches the level of kufr/apostasy, he is NOT CONSIDERED a descendent of our Master Rasulullah ﷺ anymore. Allah severed the relationship of Prophet Nuuh, ‘ala nabiyyina wa ‘alaihis salam, with his son due to the son’s kufr.

Turning back on Islam severs all relationships.

Aren’t the Prophet’s ﷺ own two uncles, abu lahab and abu jahl, the filthiest, most lowliest of all kafirs?

Besides, according to some scholars, a TRUE descendent of the Prophet ﷺ (not someone who just borrowed the name) simply won’t commit kufr or even major sins like homosexuality.

Again – SHARI’AH – SHARI’AH – SHARI’AH – AND MORE SHARI’AH – is the judgment criteria.

Q. You have used very harsh language against some people, calling them as “idiots” or “swine in the skin of lamb” or “faggots” and so on. Why don’t you just refute the position gently?

A. Islam commands us to be kind to believers and harsh to kuffaar and the people of bid’ah. I haven’t mentioned any names in any case. So the harsh language is just aimed at “evil people” in general, based on the basic principles of Islam. It is NOT a part of “adab” to be sweet and gentle to the people of misguidance, bid’ah and zandaqa. While vulgarity is not good, these people need to be rebuked in the harshest possible terms.

Q. Why have you mentioned “politics” relating to the misguided people? What’s the point?

A. Politics is about POWER. Power, in and of itself, is NOT the aim of anyone, Muslim, kafir, or mubtadi’. Power is a means, and the only means, of advancing a cause, whether the cause is of Islam or kufr or bid’ah.

In these times the Ahlus Sunnah are ZERO in terms of political pull and influence. It is HIGH TIME we exercised some sensible politics ourselves or else the manhaj of the Ahlus Sunnah will go to the dogs. The kuffaar, the wahabis, the shias, the slaves of the kuffaar in the name of Sufism, they will ALL eat away the Ahlus Sunnah like scavengers, despite the fact that we are the bulk majority of the Muslim Diaspora.

DO NOT think that politics is all about money, media, influence, lobbying etc. and since we are only concerned about propagating the BELIEFS/ACTIONS/SAYINGS of the Ahlus Sunnah, politics is irrelevant to us. Those very BELIEFS/ACTIONS/SAYINGS of the Ahlus Sunnah have been, can be, and will be harmed by the various forces of kufr, misguidance and bid’ah, if we are not wise about our politics. There are plenty of examples that can be cited worldwide, where wahabis have pretended to be Sunnis, and taken control of mosques, and are now teaching the congregation’s children the filthy beliefs of anthropomorphism. In yet other instances, shayaateen start out being dedicated scholars of Islam, and once they earn a name, they bring out their poison of “interfaith prayer groups”.

IN THE VERY LEAST, if people are not proactively dedicated to advancing the cause of the Ahlus Sunnah, they should at least be aware of how power and politics is played out by the kuffaar, the munaafiqiin, and the people of bid’ah, and UNDERSTAND how these people work AND the fact that NO MUBTADI’ HAS EVER brought ANY GOOD to Islam or the Ahlus Sunnah.

They should NEVER cooperate with ANY person, entity, or organization acting in the name of “Islam” UNLESS AND UNTIL such a person, organization, or entity complies ONE HUNDRED PERCENT with The Ahlus Sunnah Manifesto – either expressly by signing on to it, or IN THE VERY LEAST, Sunni individuals, organizations and entities will at least know who is working against the Ahlus Sunnah and gauge the level of damage they are seeking to inflict.

ANY PERSON, ENTITY, OR ORGANIZATION that opposes this manifesto, should be shunned by the Sunnis IMMEDIATELY.

We have been stabbed in the back aplenty by people claiming to be Sunnis!

Q. So are you setting up a political party or claiming any leadership role? Do you belong to any political party?

A. No. Just pointing out the obvious and humbly pleading to my fellow Sunni brothers, sisters and scholars to safeguard the manhaj of the Ahlus Sunnah. Or else, we are going to leave a deplorable legacy for the next generation of Sunnis. My attempt is at education more than anything. That it benefits those Sunnis who are in a politicized situation, is a benefit.

And Allah alone grants success.



16 responses to “The Sunni Manifesto & the enemy within

  1. Abu Ihsan al-Hanafi

    June 7, 2013 at 3:37 am

    Assalam alaykum:

    I hereby agree with everything above.

  2. Arslan

    February 5, 2014 at 1:34 am

    Can you elaborate a bit more on point #22. Are you referring to the concept of Isitghaathah? Kindly expound upon that point a bit, as it may be misleading.

    • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

      February 5, 2014 at 2:01 pm

      I am referring to the concept of

      1) Calling upon directly to convey one’s own salutations, salams, greetings & prayers, as well as

      2) Begging them for their intercession for oneself, blissful responses to one’s salams & greetings, prayers to Allah for oneself, and help to oneself – by the creating & granting of Allah.

      The Quran says regarding the powers of Our Master ‘Eisa in verse 5:110:

      إِذْ قَالَ اللَّهُ يَا عِيسَى ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ اذْكُرْ نِعْمَتِي عَلَيْكَ وَعَلَىٰ وَالِدَتِكَ إِذْ أَيَّدتُّكَ بِرُوحِ الْقُدُسِ تُكَلِّمُ النَّاسَ فِي الْمَهْدِ وَكَهْلًا ۖ وَإِذْ عَلَّمْتُكَ الْكِتَابَ وَالْحِكْمَةَ وَالتَّوْرَاةَ وَالْإِنجِيلَ ۖ وَإِذْ تَخْلُقُ مِنَ الطِّينِ كَهَيْئَةِ الطَّيْرِ بِإِذْنِي فَتَنفُخُ فِيهَا فَتَكُونُ طَيْرًا بِإِذْنِي ۖ وَتُبْرِئُ الْأَكْمَهَ وَالْأَبْرَصَ بِإِذْنِي ۖ وَإِذْ تُخْرِجُ الْمَوْتَىٰ بِإِذْنِي ۖ وَإِذْ كَفَفْتُ بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ عَنكَ إِذْ جِئْتَهُم بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ فَقَالَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْهُمْ إِنْ هَٰذَا إِلَّا سِحْرٌ مُّبِينٌ

      In the all famous Dalail Al-Khayrat of the Sunnis, it says:

      يا حَبِيبَنا يا سيدَنا محمداً ، إنا نَتَوَسَّلُ بِكَ إلى رَبِّكَ ، فاشْفَعْ لنا عِنْدَ المَوْلَى العَظِيمِ يا نِعْمَ الرَّسُولُ الطَّاهِرُ

      In his Sharh of the Dalail Al-Khayrat, Shaykh ‘Abdul Majeed Al-Sharnoobi Al-Azhari says that this is based on the famous hadiith of the blind man who was taught by the Prophet, sall Allahu ‘alaihi wa sallam, himself, regarding tawassul and istighathah. The blind man prayed as commanded by the Prophet, sall Allahu ‘alaihi wa sallam, and his eyesight was restored.

      Istighathah is just another form of tawassul, nothing more, nothing less. It is nothing to be misled about. Do not let the wahabis confuse you.

      • Arslan

        June 1, 2014 at 8:55 am

        This still needs some clarification.

        Firstly, by consensus you can only call upon the deceased slaves of Allah (in the manner you described)when close to their graves. Secondly, you can only ask them for blessings, intercession, tawassul etc… And NOT direct aid.

        Thirdly, there is a difference of opinion on whether non- prophets can hear in their graves. Those who say the cannot hear do no permit istighaathah with them even when near the graves.

      • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

        June 1, 2014 at 10:01 am

        You said: you can only call upon the deceased slaves of Allah (in the manner you described)when close to their graves.

        Reply: Please bring evidence or reference for your claims. Please state from where you got this rule that they can only be called upon near their graves and not from afar.

        You said: Secondly, you can only ask them for blessings, intercession, tawassul etc… And NOT direct aid.

        Reply: 1. Again, firstly bring evidence to corroborate what you said.
        2. Define “intercession”, “blessings”, “tawassul” and “direct aid”; and then state
        3. What is the difference between asking them for intercession, tawassul & blessings, as opposed to direct aid?

        You said: there is a difference of opinion on whether non- prophets can hear in their graves. Those who say the cannot hear do no permit istighaathah with them even when near the graves.

        Reply: Again, please provide evidence and references before we speak any further.

        Again, please do not be misled by the wahabis or the munafiq sufis. Look for a good scholar of the Ahlus Sunnah to have your doubts removed.

  3. Arslan

    June 1, 2014 at 11:19 pm


    The crux is the following passage:

    “One is to beseech the Most High that he completes something on account of the holiness of such a such person. This is permissible by consensus regardless of whether this is [done] at the grave or some other place. No one has any objection to this.”

    “The second is to address the person of the grave by saying, ‘You fulfil my work’. This is shirk, regardless of whether this is said at the grave or away from it. [snip]

    “The third is [snip]”


    The first one described is actually tawassul. As you said yourself, istighaatha is just another form of tawassul.

    • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

      June 2, 2014 at 10:14 pm

      to address the person of the grave by saying, ‘You fulfil my work’. This is shirk, regardless of whether this is said at the grave or away from it.

      This is shirk regardless if said to a deceased Muslim by his grave or even to a living Muslim – IF – the person calling believes that the one addressed can fulfill his work by his own creating.

      Even when we ask a living person to fulfill an objective, we ask it based on the ‘aqiidah that this world is a world of causes and effects and Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala is The Creator of ALL CAUSES AND ALL EFFECTS.

      If one has the ‘aqiidah that Allah is The Creator of ALL CAUSES AND ALL EFFECTS, which all Muslims do have, then it becomes irrelevant if the person being asked is living or dead, for we believe that Allah is The Creator of the one asking, the one being asked, and also the job being delivered.

      If someone doesn’t have the ‘aqiidah that Allah is The Creator of ALL CAUSES AND ALL EFFECTS, then even asking the local pizza delivery boy to deliver a pizza would be shirk. Allah is The Creator of us and our deeds.

      Re your 3rd point, please bring references from classical sources (this is not to challenge you, but only to discuss), but as long as someone holds tight to the ‘aqiidah that Allah is The Creator of ALL causes and ALL effects and ALL deeds of the slaves, there is no problem.

      The legendary Hanafi jurist and Sufi saint Shah Waliyullah Muhaddith Dehlvi from the indian subcontinent considered istighatha permissible, both through our Master RasulAllah ﷺ, as well as through sahaba and other pious Muslim awliyaa.

      • Arslan

        June 2, 2014 at 11:27 pm

        The reason why muftiyan give the fatwa of calling onto the deceased in the graves for aid as being haram or shirk is because it is strongly suggestive of the deceased having intrinsic power, or being granted divinity. However, asking them to make shifaa’ or du’aa for you is permissible as that is just tawassul, which is agreed upon by jurists to be absolutely permissible.

      • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

        June 11, 2014 at 4:24 am

        Brother, we are going in circles. As I said, it is haram AND shirk to even call on the living if one believes them to have any power or will independent of Allah’s Will, or believes them to be the creator of any cause or effect.

        Even for material items, like for example medicine. It is kufr to believe that medicine by itself cures due to its intrinsic characteristic. It is bid’ah to believe that medicine delivers the cure due to a power Allah granted it. The belief of the Ahlus Sunnah is that Allah is The Creator of the medicine AND He is The Creator of the cure.

        That is when we speak in terms of beliefs/’aqaid in their contexts. In terms of everyday usage of language, it is not kufr to say things like “black seeds contain the cure for many diseases” or “smoking causes cancer” as long as a Muslim holds the right belief of the Ahlus Sunnah that Allah is The Creator of ALL causes and ALL effects. This is due to the fact that language is limited and common everyday talk is not a description of ‘aqidah and people speak in terms of the general and normative cause-effect setup of the world as created by Allah, Him being The Creator of ALL causes and ALL effects – knowing full well that the same cause doesn’t necessarily lead to the same effect, as per His Will. When someone says ‘smoking causes cancer’ he knows full well that Allah is The Creator of the slave, what he smokes, the slave’s act of smoking, and the cancer. It is full well possible that smoking doesn’t cause cancer as is the case with many smokers. We all say “fire burns” in general usage knowing full well that Allah is The Creator of the fire AND the burning effect. In the case of our Master Ibrahiim, ‘alaihis salam, the fire was “cool and peaceful” on him, because that’s what Allah Willed and He is The Creator of the fire as well as the cooling and peaceful effect. He can create a non-normative effect and link it to the cause, as was the case of the fire for our Master Ibrahiim ‘alaihis salam.

        In short, the general principle is that calling on anyone, living or dead, is shirk – if the caller does not hold tight to the beliefs of the Ahlus Sunnah. It is NOT shirk, if the caller does believe in the basic Sunni belief that Allah is The Creator of us and our deeds, of all causes and all effects. It might be possible that some scholars issued a ruling of impermissibility of certain actions to protect the common people from falling into bid’ah or disbelief, but those kind of rulings are specific & circumstantial, and restricted to place and time, and not general principles.

        You mentioned the indian subcontinent. I gave you the example that it is proven that Shah Waliyullah, a notable Sufi saint from the indian subcontinent revered by all people from the subcontinent, practiced istighatha and condoned it, asking for the aid of our Master ‘Ali, radzi Allahu ‘anhu wa karram Allahu wajhahu.

  4. Arslan Sana

    June 11, 2014 at 5:36 am

    By the way, I dont think any Hanafi `aalim in the world completely forbids istighaatha. Just some forms of istighaatha need to be watched out for. Thats all.

  5. Muslim

    January 14, 2015 at 7:46 am

    Subhan Allah, what an angry and misguided blog talking about ahlul-sunnah wrongly. May Allah forgive me for previously recommending someone to read one of your posts on this blog.

    • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

      January 14, 2015 at 10:11 am

      Anger is NECESSARY for the heretics and munafiqiin.

      Show me the misguided parts, WITH EVIDENCE, or shut up and get lost.

      I know this blog is a severe eyesore for both syncretist “sufis” who love the pope as well as the wahabis.

  6. mike

    January 18, 2015 at 3:24 am

    Whoever wrote this associate himself with Allah by claiming to know who is “kafir” and who is not.

    • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

      January 18, 2015 at 7:01 am

      Who is kafir and who is not is defined by the principles of Islam stated in the Quran & Sunnah, as taught by Rasulullah ﷺ, his companions, and the scholars of who propagated those teachings.

      If you don’t like to be called kafir and don’t want to have your face torched in hell-fire, say “La ilaha il-Allah Muhammadur RasulAllah” – There is no God except Allah, and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. If you say it and accept those things which are necessary to be believed in Islam, as taught by RasulAllah ﷺ, then you are a Muslim, otherwise you most certainly are a kafir destined to everlasting hell-fire. These are the teachings of Islam stated in the Quran and Sunnah.

      The first Caliph of Islam, the master of Muslims after Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, our master Abu Bakr, radzi Allahu ‘anhu, went to war against the apostates who claimed to be Muslim but refused to acknowledge the obligation of zakah.

      To be considered, and called Muslim – one has to state the declaration of faith with firm conviction in the heart – and he has to accept those matters that are necessarily required to be accepted by Muslims, as taught by RasulAllah ﷺ. Anything else, and the person is a kafir and all kafirs shall be tormented endlessly in hellfire.

  7. Zubair Abdussalam

    June 12, 2018 at 1:37 pm

    Assalamu alaikkum Shaykh,
    You mentioned
    “the harsh language is just aimed at “evil people” in general, based on the basic principles of Islam. It is NOT a part of “adab” to be sweet and gentle to the people of misguidance, bid’ah and zandaqa. While vulgarity is not good, these people need to be rebuked in the harshest possible terms.”

    Can you provide the proof for this from classical texts ?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: