RSS

Home

As-Salamu ‘Alaikum

The look n feel of the blog will be re-hashed shortly.

Please go to the Posts page to read the posts:

Click Here

 

22 responses to “Home

  1. Dr.M.Naseem

    September 15, 2016 at 3:21 pm

    Wonderful work by blogger

     
  2. Abdullah

    April 25, 2017 at 1:04 pm

    Jazakallah khir may Allah reward you for this excellent blog. Can you please make a post about the noble Qu’ran verse 5:32 “.. any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people..” Munafiqoon always use this ayah in wrong contexts to appease their kafir masters.

     
  3. Aurangzeb

    June 3, 2018 at 11:47 am

    THE INTERFAITH SNARE

    ONLY JUHALA AND MURTADS ARE ENSNARED

    One of Shaitaan’s most potent weapons and traps in this age is the kuffaar interfaith movement designed to undermined and destroy Islam. Yet, we find socalled ‘ulama’ (jaahil molvis and sheikhs) sacrificing their Imaan and becoming murtads by casting themselves into the tentacles of this snare. Among the victims in this trap are some stupid molvis who unintentionally and unknowingly eliminate their Imaan with their participation in this evil movement established by the western kuffaar.

    The western Christians have made substantial inroads in Muslim countries with their missionary activity. Millions of totally jaahil Muslims have been weaned from Islam and have renounced the Deen. In our age, these missionaries have added another dimension to their conspiracy of destroying Islam, and that is the interfaith movement which shaitaan has adorned and presented to the molvis and sheikhs in extremely deceptive ways.

    While the missionaries have been converting ignorant Muslims in many lands, they are now converting molvis and sheikhs and the socalled jaahil Muslim intelligentsia without these jaahils even realizing that by their participation in the interfaith plot they are eliminating their Imaan. Their renunciation of islam is so subtly achieved that they fail to perceive the kufr in their hearts.

    Islam allows only Tabligh and Da’wat to the kuffaar. There is no scope whatsoever in Islam for accepting, even superficially, the beliefs of other religions and ideologies. A fundamental article of the interfaith ideology is that ISLAM IS NOT THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH, AND THAT ALL RELIGIONS AND IDEOLOGIES ( EVEN ATHEISM) ARE ON PAR. Sitting, cooperating and discussing with people on this basis is explicit kufr which destroys Imaan.

    The ‘Muslims’ who engage in this movement, hugging and embracing the priests and the pundits of kufr, are in fact servile bootlickers. Kufr is dinned into their ears. They are constrained to listen attentively and obediently to the deluge of kufr disgorgement from the priests and pundits who are the dominant figures in this satanic plot hatched to destroy Islam.

    The one and only way of dialogue with kuffaar, is the method of Tabligh and Da’wat in the way discharged by the Ambiya (Alayhimus salaam). There is no other way. Islam came for the everlasting salvation of mankind in the Hereafter.

    The objective of Islam is not embracing kuffaar priests and atheists, hugging them affording them an attentive ear for their kufr disgorgement, and to superciliously convey to them that Islam tolerates their beliefs of kufr.

    The Qur’aan Majeed, explaining the Islamic methodology, states explicitly: “Verily, you (O kuffaar!) and whatever you are worshipping besides Allah are the fuel of Jahannam. You will be entering it.” (Al-Ambiya, Aayat 97)

    In denigration and rejection of the kufr of his community, Nabi Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam) in a dialogue with the kuffaar, said:

    “What! Do they (your idols) hear you when you call them? Or do they benefit or harm you?” They said: “In fact, we found our forefathers doing so (worshipping). He (Ibraaheem) said: ‘What do you think of the things you worship – you and your forefathers. Verily, they are my enemies except Rabbul Aalameen Who has created me, then it is He Who has guided me.” (Remember) when Ibraaheem said to his father and his people: “Verily, I am free from the things you worship……” Verily, for you (O Muslimeen!) there is a beautiful way/pattern/ideology in Ibraaheem and those with him. Remember when he said to his people: ‘Verily, we are free from you and from the things you worship. We have rejected you, and everlasting hatred and animosity have become manifest between you and us as long as you (do not) believe in The One Allah….”

    This then is the methodology and the attitude of the Mu’min when having dialogue with the kuffaar. The Muballigh is not permitted to adopt an ambivalent, dubious satanically deceptive policy which has room for overt acceptance of the dictates and terms of the shaitaani kuffaar interfaith religion which stipulates submission to its cardinal kufr articles of faith for participation. It is this overt acceptance of the kufr articles of faith which renders the molvis and sheikhs murtad.

    The methodology of Tabligh and Da’wat is only the way of the Ambiya (Alayhimus salaam) which is clearer than daylight. There is no ambiguity and deception in the Da’wat methodology of Islam.

     
    • alfaida

      March 28, 2019 at 6:17 pm

      As salaam alaikum
      💯% agree
      Was salaam

       
  4. Muhammad

    June 7, 2019 at 11:17 pm

    The following excerpt contains some beneficial information regarding the delegation of Christians from Najraan. The incident is often distorted and misused by those Munafiqeen this website is dedicated to exposing:

    It will be salubrious if the Murtad Mudhil elaborates on the Najraani episode. But never will he be able to present the truth of this anecdote. To dispel the baatil and falsehood which the Murtad attempted to spin in his bid to pull wool over the eyes of the ignorant and unwary, we present here some aspects pertaining to the Christian delegation which had visited Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

    When the delegation reached Madinah Munawwarah, its members removed their travel dress and donned their gaudily adorned garments and golden rings. According to their proudful style, their long cloaks dragged on the ground as they walked. In this state of pomp and show they came to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and greeted him. Our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) did not respond to their greeting.

    They endeavoured the whole day to engage Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) in conversation, but he rebuffed them. He did not speak with them. Then they set out in search of Hadhrat Uthmaan (Radhiyallahu anhu) and Hadhrat Abdur Rahmaan Bin Auf (Radhiyallahu anh). They were acquainted with these two senior Sahaabah. After they located the two, the Christians said:

    “O Uthmaan! O Abdur Rahmaan! Your Nabi had written a letter to us. We have come to respond to his letter. We came and greeted, but he refused to respond to our greeting. We endeavoured the entire day to speak to him, but he avoided us. What is your advice? Do you advise that we should return?”

    Both these Sahaabah sought the advice of Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu) who said:

    “They should remove their gaudy garments and their golden rings, and don their travel dress, then go to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).”

    This advice was heeded. The delegation acted accordingly. Then when they came into the presence of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and greeted, he returned their greeting. Then Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

    “I take an oath by That Being Who has sent me with the Truth! They (i.e. the delegation) had come to me the first time with the adornment of Iblees….”

    Then Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) engaged them in discussion. Before the delegation had arrived, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had issued the following ultimatum to them:

    “Accept Islam, and you will be granted safety…….I am calling you away from the worship of slaves to the worship of Allah Ta’ala. I call you away from the friendship of slaves to the Friendship of Allah. If you refuse (to accept this demand), then payment of Jizyah will be incumbent on you. If you refuse (even payment of Jizyah), then take notice of war. Was-salaam”

    Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had also informed them:

    “Three things impede you from accepting Islam: Worshipping the cross; devouring the flesh of swines, and believing that Isaa (Alayhis salaam) is the son of Allah.”

    Regarding the delegation of Najraan, the Qur’aan Majeed states:

    “The Truth is from your Rabb (O Muhammad!). Therefore, do not be among those who doubt. Whoever disputes with you in this matter (of the Haqq) after Knowledge (by Wahi) has come to you, then say: ‘Come! Let us call our sons and your sons, our wives and your wives, ourselves and yourselves, then we shall supplicate sincerely (and earnestly) invoking the La’nat (Curse) of Allah on the liars.”

    (Aal-e-Imraan, 59 and 60)

    This was the challenge which Allah Ta’ala commanded Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to issue to the Najraani Christians. The delegation had asked Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) why he was speaking ill of ‘their person’……………….Upon this Allah Ta’ala revealed the aforementioned Aayat of Mubaahalah. However, the Christians were scared, hence refused to take up the challenge.

    Far, very far from any bootlicking and listening to any sermon of kufr from the Najraani delegation, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) imposed on them an annual Jizyah tax of 2,000 suits of garments in the month of Rajab. Thereafter, Nabi-e-Kareem (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) told them that if they had engaged him in the Mubaahalah to invoke the La’nat of Allah Azza Wa Jal, the entire Christian population of Najraan would have been destroyed. All of them would have been transformed into apes and swines, and the entire region would have been consumed by a raging fire. Thereafter, not even birds would perch on the trees of Najraan.

    This then is the story of the Najraani delegation which the Murtad Mudhil and all other munaafiq bootlickers and modernists cite to justify kuffaar presence in the Musaajid.

    Is there any semblance of bootlicking by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) in this episode? Did Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) obfuscate the Haqq and allow the Christians to insult the Qur’aan and Islam, and to din the ears of Muslims with such kufr and blasphemy which insult the Deen, the Qur’aan and the Nabi? Did Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) invite the Najraanis to propagate their kufr and shirk in the Musjid?

    By putridly and stupidly mentioning the Najraani delegation, this Murtad and all other mudhilleen molvis and modernists hoodwink the ignorant masses into the satanic understanding that the Najraani delegation was in a dominant position and had dictated to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Muslimeen.

    In addition to there being not the slightest vestige of bootlicking, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) acquitted himself with belligerency. He refused to greet them. He refused to speak to them the entire day when they arrived. They were constrained to disrobe and don their old, dirty travel garments. They were issued the Mubaahalah challenge with the consequences of being transformed into apes and pigs, and finally an annula tax was imposed on them under threat of Jihad.

    Is there any resemblance between the anecdote of Najraan and the bootlicking kufr ceremong of the kaafir priest inside the Musjid at the invitation of the Murtad, Mudhil Agent of Iblees? Every Muslim can now quite easily understand the farce and fallacy of the Najraani analogy drawn by the jaahil murtad sheikhush shaitaan to justify the sermon of kufr inside the Musjid.

    “O People of Imaan! If you follow the kuffaar, they will (only) turn you on your heels (to renege and become murtads), then you will become losers (in this dunya and in the Aakhirat).” (Aal-e-Imraan, Aayat 149)

    “But in fact, He (Allah) is your Friend, and He is the best of friends.” (Aal-e-Imraan, Aayat 150)

    “Verily, those who have believed (had become Muslims), then they committed kufr, then again they believed, then again committed kufr, then they increased the kufr (as this Agent of Iblees has done), Allah will not forgive them nor will He guide them to the (Straight) Path.” (An-Nisaa’, Aayat 137)

    “Convey to the munaafiqeen (such as the kuffaar bootlickers) the tidings that most certainly for them there is a Painful Chastisement. They (the munaafiqeen) are those who take as friends the kaafireen (just as the mumtazul baatil character has perpetrated) besides the Mu’mineen. What! Are they searching for honour from them (from the kaafireen)? (Know!) that verily all honour belongs to Allah.” (An-Nisaa’, 138 and 139)

    May Allah Ta’ala protect our Imaan and may He keep us steadfast on Siraatul Mustaqeem and take our Souls at the end of this earthly sojourn with our Imaan intact. “Imaan is suspended between fear and hope.” No one knows what the morrow holds for him. Just reflect! Meditate on the abyss of kufr into which the Imaam of this UK Musjid has plunged into. It is indeed fearful. We seek Allah’s Protection from the evil of our nafs and the snares of Iblees.

    “Salaam on those who follow Allah’s Guidance.”

     
  5. Constantine Stambolitis

    June 14, 2020 at 1:44 pm

    I’m a non-Muslim who is confused about Islam based on different interpretations I hear. Since Muslims believe in al wala wal bara, is it anti-semitism/racism when Muslims have bara for the Jews(Bani Israel) if the Arabs are also Semitic? Why no bara for the Arabs? Why don’t Muslims say they have bara for the Italians who are majority not Muslim? Best, Constantine

     
    • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

      June 14, 2020 at 3:23 pm

      Thank you Constantine for your question.

      Wala and bara have nothing to do with race. It only has to do with religion.

      Our affinities, fraternity, and friendships are reserved for our brothers and sisters in Islam, regardless if they are black or white or brown, or their lineage. For all others, we have to deal with them even-handedly and justly. We reciprocate niceness with niceness and vice versa, without compromising on our faith and principles.

      The jews are a race as well as a religion. We have no issues with their lineage or race. Do you know that “Israel” is the name of a prophet of Allah (our master Yaquub ‘alaihis Salam (Jacob)), and most jews belong from his lineage? We are certainly against the jewish religion of rejection of the prophets ‘Eisa and Muhammad, peace be upon them, and we negate the jewish religion.

      A lot of companions of our Master RasulAllah ﷺ were ethnically children of Israel, as were many notable Muslims throughout history.

      Perhaps these posts can help you understand better:

      Hadith: The Islam of our master ‘Abdullah bin Salam, radzi Allahu ‘anhu

      A “Match the Following” Test in Aadaab

       
      • Constantine Stambolitis

        June 14, 2020 at 5:43 pm

        Thank you for the response. So bara towards the Bani Israel isn’t about them being Israelites, it’s about being kuffar. Same goes for Italians. It’s that the Jews are just mentioned more then lots of groups so Muslims mentioning they have bara towards the Jews is just because it’s a bit more well known. Muslims would have bara towards the Arabs today if they were kuffar and it wouldn’t count as racism because it isn’t about them being Arabs, it’s about them being kuffar.

         
      • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

        June 24, 2020 at 9:49 pm

        Yes our wala (affinity and clemency) is for someone’s being Muslim – regardless if it is for blacks or whites or ethnic Jewish of lineage (Israelites/Semites) or Asian or brown or Arab or any race or ethnicity. Our bara (dissociation and disavowal while maintaining justice) is for someone’s being kafir, also regardless of race or ethnicity.

        To explain to you properly, think of modern day nationalism and patriotism as you see in the western nations. Only in this case our “citizenship”, “nationality” and “patriotism” is defined by religion and not by geopolitical borders, ethnicity, race, language, or skin color.

        There are indeed many Arab kuffar. There are Arab jews as well as christians as well as atheists and agnostics in current times.

         
      • Constantine Stambolitis

        June 24, 2020 at 10:32 pm

        I understand a bit more of what you’re saying. Bara also includes hating things that people hate like murder. Another form of bara is being critical towards Judaism when it says if a father is an Israelite but the mom isn’t(except if she converts to Judaism), the baby isn’t an Israelite, the baby is cursed by god plus the father isn’t actually his dad and the dad is cursed as well. Also saying children are born of original sin, regardless if they are Christians or not.

         
      • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

        June 25, 2020 at 3:15 pm

        Yes, bara is also from sinful deeds like murder. You queried regarding bara from people so we were communicating only in that context.

        While we can be critical of the canonical laws of judaism or any other religion, it is a waste of time and effort. Canonical laws are based on creed and theology. We are concerned about firstly propagating the truth of Islamic creed and theology to nonMuslims. Once a person accepts Tawhiid (the belief of Allah as being the Creator and Owner of everything, The Only God, and The Only One worthy of being worshiped) and Risaalah (Prophethood), all else will fall in place.

        It should also be pointed out here that this theology also entails Islam’s absolute and unyielding monopoly and superiority on ALL religious, moral, and spiritual truth, as well as salvation of man.

        We do not believe children are born of original sin. Rather we believe that man is born pure on his innate nature, ready to accept Islam.

         
      • Constantine Stambolitis

        June 25, 2020 at 4:00 pm

        Thank you for the response. Of course murder shouldn’t be liked. Also the second paragraph I kinda agree. Were you aware of this belief in Judaism I described? I don’t like how Judaism can blame kids, that’s so messed up and somewhat disgusting. I believe the kids are I. innocents. They believed Moses came with that law and the prophets after him like David believed so? Do you believe it’s racist? I also don’t believe in original sin and Christianity has almost total original sin in everything while Judaism in limited circumstances. I believe the kids in Christianity are innocent, not cursed.

         
      • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

        June 27, 2020 at 9:32 am

        I was somewhat acquainted with the belief you described, based on what I heard from people.

         
      • Constantine Stambolitis

        June 27, 2020 at 12:26 pm

        Thank you for telling me that. It is sad for people to believe children are cursed. It upsets me sometimes because I believe children have worth, no matter what the parents did.

         
      • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

        June 27, 2020 at 1:52 pm

        In Islam we do not believe children to be cursed. Even if a child was born of rape or adultery, he deserves to be treated with his dignity like any other child, as he is not responsible for the sin of his parents. We believe no one bears the burden of someone else’s deeds.

         
      • Constantine Stambolitis

        June 27, 2020 at 7:11 pm

        Thank you for the reply. Why does Judaism say there are circumstances where children are cursed by God and Christianity says they always are but Islam says no? Why these religions are unfair about kids in certain things?

         
      • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

        June 27, 2020 at 9:16 pm

        The principal answer to that (or any other question of that sort) from the Muslim side is: because christianity and judaism of today are NOT AT ALL based on the true teachings of the blessed prophets of Allah, our masters Moses and Jesus peace be upon them, but rather on the fabrications and alterations in their books by their priests and rabbis and the illogical whims of men, and simply do not appeal to the sound mind.

        Islam alone is the true faith that leads to salvation of man and appeals to the sound mind.

        For starters, just how illogical and nonsensical is it to call Jesus as “son of God” only because he doesn’t have a human father but just a human virgin mother!!! The christians fail to see that Adam was created without a father or mother.

        The jews rejected the prophethood of our masters Jesus and the last prophet Muhammad, while the christians attribute godhood to Jesus and reject belief in prophet Muhammad, peace be on them all – and all of this rejection of prophets is blasphemy as is attributing divinity to prophets who are all creation of Allah. Rejection of any one prophet of Allah is rejection of all of them and disbelief in Allah.

         
      • Constantine Stambolitis

        June 27, 2020 at 11:02 pm

        Christianity and Judaism are false, you don’t need Islam to see that. Christians saying children are born into sin and Jews saying children are born into sin if the mom isn’t a Jew but the dad is due to desires in my opinion. Even the members themselves that are religious have subtle signs they dislike these religions, why do they follow them than if you are criticizing the religions either covertly or unintentionally?

         
      • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

        June 28, 2020 at 3:26 am

        Of course you need Islam to see that christianity and judaism are false and illogical because the other religions and belief systems like hinduism, buddhism, confucianism, atheism, agnosticism, etc. are even more false and quackery than christianity and judaism. Atheism is the ultimate quackery. As for your question, no point asking me that.

         
      • Constantine Stambolitis

        June 28, 2020 at 8:47 am

        Thank you for the response. I already see these religions are false without me being a Muslim myself. I get why you said I need Islam because I’ll see more in my opinion why. I know why you said you won’t answer the question, it’s because they know the religions are false but still follow it despite showing subtle signs of criticism towards them.

         
      • 'Abd-Allah al-Mujaddidi al-Naqshbandi

        June 28, 2020 at 9:33 am

        Not only will you see more, but you will also see properly that Islam is THE ONLY religious, moral and spiritual truth and that which appeals to the sound human mind.

         

Leave a comment